• Home
  • Booklets/Grouped Entries
  • Tech Tsunami
  • List of Entries to Date
  • About the Author

usrevolution5

~ USA Headed for a 5th Revolution! Why?

usrevolution5

Monthly Archives: September 2014

#86 Is North Carolina the “Stealin’ State”?

27 Saturday Sep 2014

Posted by Jordan Abel in Back Asswards Thinking, Causes of the Revolution, Economics, Societal Issues

≈ 2 Comments

(Readers: Please note the blog is constructed as a story. While not all chapters are linked, after reading a few recent entries, you might want to start at the beginning. More about the blog and about the author. )

Scene: Jordan having coffee with JC at usual spot near office in Washington, DC.  Jordan holds up newspaper article.

Jordan: “You know, this article really bothers me.”

newspaper_bwJC: “What’s the issue?  Headline says North Carolina wants to attract jobs.  What’s wrong with jobs?”

Jordan: “Jobs are not the issue.  The issue is how jobs are created…emphasis on ‘created.’”

JC: “I’m not following your logic.  The state of NC wants more jobs, so…”

Jordan: “…excuse me but North Carolina’s idea of job creation is stealing jobs from other areas.”

JC: “Whoa, big boy, slow down.  Stealing?  Did you say stealing?”

Jordan: “Yes, I said stealing.  And I mean stealing.”

010414_1635_16StudentsL1.jpgJC: “Why is attracting jobs from another location stealing?”

Jordan: “Look at it from the perspective of the other location.  What gives NC the right to take jobs?”

JC: “I’ll be honest.  I never thought about job relocation as stealing.”

Jordan: “Let’s say you have a factory in town.  And say the factory has been there a while.”

JC: “Ok.  What about it?”

Jordan: “And let’s say your father worked there.  And maybe your grandfather.  That’s not uncommon.”

JC: “I’ve read stories about families like that.”

Jordan: “When I was at Buick it was not unusual to find people who were 3rd generation.  Same town, same factory.”

JC: “If you take the three generations, there’s what 100 years…or more seniority in one family.  That’s a lot of time devoted to one company.”

Jordan: “Right.  Seems like a major commitment to me.”

JC: “A major commitment but the people also got paid along the way.  So what’s the big deal?”

manufacturing-production-operations-jobsJordan: “You don’t get it, do you, which is really surprising coming from you.  The big deal is people.  People make up organizations.  Paychecks don’t make organizations.”

JC: “I agree that families, companies, even cities are built around people.”

Jordan: “And people create and build an emotional bond with the organization.”

JC: “OK but I’m still not following why recruiting jobs from another state should be labeled as stealing.  What am I missing?”

Jordan: “What has the recruiter done to help build the organization and the emotional bond?”

JC: “Nothing really.  But the recruiter does offer incentives.  Now that I said that, the incentives are really for senior executives…and not the worker bees.”

money_24077_lgJordan: “To me allowing one state to recruit companies…really jobs…from another state, perverts the incentive to create jobs.  Allowing recruiting destroys loyalty and prevents workers from building a strong emotional bond with the company.”

JC: “So my cynical self says, so what?  Who really cares about the workers?  Why shouldn’t management take a few bucks?”

Jordan: “Yes, your cynical self has taken over.  But now I know you understand why I am frustrated with the program.  Money talks…but only for a very few.  A lot of other Mickey-Mouse-fingerpeople get the finger.”

JC: “I see what you mean by calling it stealing.  People put a lot of time and effort into building an organization…and then wham, management packs up and leaves.”

Jordan: “Most people think about stealing in terms of not paying for goods or services.  You know, like walking out of Best Buy with a computer or skipping out of a restaurant and not paying for dinner.”

JC: “But you want to expand the definition.”

Jordan: “I’m not expanding the definition.  Just making sure people include one thing that cannot be purchased and cannot be replaced.”

50166_clock1038_lgJC: “Is that one thing…time?”

Jordan: “Yes, time. What many executives and especially investors seem to forget is the value of time.”

JC: “Give me an example.”

Jordan: “I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard prospective investors ask, ‘How much skin…meaning how much money… you have in this project?”

JC: “Seems like a fair question.  How do you answer them?”

Jordan: “With another question.”

JC: “What else coming from you.  What’s the question?”

Jordan: “Simple.  ‘Can you buy yesterday?’”

JC: “Can you buy yesterday?”

Jordan: “Yes.  Simple question with a simple answer.”

JC: “The answer is always ‘no’.”

Jordan: “Think about it, regardless of how much money one has, yesterday is not for sale.”

JC: “So how do the investors respond?”

Jordan: “Surprisingly, most have never been asked the question…or even thought about it.”

JC: “Does the question change the tone of the conversation?”

Jordan: “Sometimes.  But my experience has been most investors, especially private equity firms and investment banks are so focused on one thing – how much money can they make – that they do not care about your time and commitment.  To them one’s time is of no value.”

JC: “Without sounding too much like a Republican, isn’t that why they’re in business – to maximize profits?”

Jordan: “Partially.  But not the entire reason for being.  The companies do have an obligation to society.”

JC: “Surely you are not opposed to letting investors make money?”

Jordan: “I’m all for making money, but not at the expense of destroying families, institutions and cities.”

JC: “You’re sounding like a populist.”

Jordan: “Maybe so but this is a conversation that society needs to have.”

JC: “Anyway, we started this conversation by you stating the state of North Carolina was stealing.  If I understand your logic, recruiting companies to relocate in North Carolina, or any state for that matter, is stealing from families and cities where the organization is located currently.  Right?”

Jordan: “You got it right.”

JC: “I need some more of your thinking but I also need a refill.”

(To be continued)

Advertisement

#85 Since When Are Facts Racist?

20 Saturday Sep 2014

Posted by Jordan Abel in Back Asswards Thinking, Economics, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

(Yes, I took off a week.  Hope you survived.  🙂  Readers: Please note the blog is constructed as a story. While not all chapters are linked, after reading a few recent entries, you might want to start at the beginning. More about the blog and about the author. )

Scene: Jordan’s office.  Makes phone call.

Jordan:  “Greenie, I need some advice.”

010414_1635_16StudentsL2.jpg Greenie:  “About what?”

Jordan:  “Either I am living in a bubble or being politically correct has overtaken the United States.   Can’t we discuss facts anymore?”

Greenie:  “What are you talking about?  What’s the issue?”

Jordan:  “The principal owner of the Atlanta Hawks is being forced to sell his stake.”

Greenie:  “Why are you asking me?  And are the Atlanta Hawks some kind of sports team?”

Jordan: “Yes, the Hawks are a sports team.  Professional basketball.”

ATL Hawks LogoGreenie: “Jordan, are you OK?  I know absolutely nothing about professional basketball.”

Jordan: “But you have a lot of experience being involved with social issues.  That’s why I called.”

Greenie: “Alright.  I appreciate your confidence.  So why did this guy have to sell?”

Jordan:  “Because of alleged racist remarks.  The NBA…Natiuonal Basketball Association…implemented the ‘must-sell’ policy after the incident with Donald Sterling.   You know the LA Lakers guy.”

Greenie: “I remember reading about that Sterling guy.  So now if an owner says something racist, he has to sell?”

Jordan:  “Yes.  My beef is not with the policy.   My beef is what the NBA calls racist remarks.”

Greenie:  “You’ve got to give me some details.   What did the guy say that was so bad?  What’s the owner’s name anyway?”

Jordan:  “Owner is Bill Levenson, I mean Bruce Levenson.   From everything I’ve read, the comments weren’t racist. ”

Greenie:  “That BNA or NBA, whatever it is, must think so.   What did he say?”

nba-logoJordan:  “According to the New York Times, Levenson wrote an email to a couple of other Hawk executives expressing concern the white fans were staying away, in part because of the high percentage of black fans.”

Greenie:  “Were the remarks disparaging in any way?”

Jordan:  “A bunch of people got all exorcised, which is no surprise.  But I’m trying to figure out what the real issue is.  The email asked for ideas how to increase the white fan base.”

Greenie:  “What prompted the email?”

Jordan:  “Poor fan attendance.   Hawks are near or at the bottom of the league in attendance per game.   Levenson’s concern was two-fold.   One, he thought southern whites were not comfortable around that many black fans. ”

Greenie:  “What else?”

Jordan:  “He also questioned whether enough affluent blacks would support the team to make up for white fans not attending and the lack of corporate sponsors.  Levenson thought corporations were reluctant to support the Hawks because of the high percentage of blacks attending.”

Greenie:  “OK, the questions aren’t pretty but seem fair.  What were the racist comments? ”

Jordan:  “That’s my question.   Levenson asks some legitimate business questions and is branded a racist.”

Greenie: “What about claiming white fans not comfortable around a lot of black fans?”

Jordan: “Well, OK.  What about it?  Probably true.

Greenie: “C’mon.”

Jordan: “No, you c’mon.  People know when they’re the minority and it creates some anxiety.  I think we all feel that way.  Sometimes more so than other times, but people know when they are in the minority.”

Greenie:  “OK, when do you feel uncomfortable?”

Jordan: “Just to make sure it’s not perceived as racist, I’ll tell you when.  And you’ll fit the same category.”

Greenie: “Then when?”

Jordan: “Do you think I feel comfortable in a crowd of born-again Christians?   Talk about feeling like a duck out of water.  But that’s no different from the born-again’s not feeling comfortable at a High Holy Day service.”

Greenie:  “I understand what you’re saying…and agree by the way.  Were the rest of Levenson’s comments similar?”

Jordan:  “I thought so, at least from what I’ve read.   Apparently the Hawks play rap music during the breaks.   I’m sure a lot of fans might ask, ‘Why am taking my time and paying my money to listen to rap music at a Hawk’s game?’   It’s a fair question.”

Greenie:  “Sounds as if the Hawks made an effort to attract a black fan base…and were successful.”

Jordan:  “Successful except for one thing…economics for the owners.”

Greenie: “Not enough people attending the Hawk’s games.”

Jordan:  “So an owner asks his staff about ideas to increase attendance.”

Greenie:  “Since blacks are filling the arena, he asks for ideas to increase white attendance.   Seems like a straight-forward business question to me.”

Jordan:  “But labeled as racist by the NBA.   Seems like the NBA is the one that’s racist.”

Greenie:  “There must be more to the story.”

Jordan:  “There’s a lot of lip-flapping and name calling.  But as far as real substance, and real racism, I’m not aware of it.”

Greenie:  “The action by the NBA is a true head scratcher.   Might even qualify as ‘stupid is as stupid does.’  Might set back race relations rather than help.”

Self-Destruct-ButtonJordan:  “I’m going to make a prediction. The NBA keeps acting like this and advertisers will stay away in droves.   Then, the NBA will self destruct.  Maybe not die but shrink dramatically.”

Greenie:  “I forget sometimes you used to control a very large advertising budget.”

Jordan:  “Most advertisers do not like controversy.”

Greenie:  “But aren’t sports important, especially to beer and automotive companies?”

Jordan:  “Absolutely.   But there are many venues other than the NBA.   If I were still on that side of the business, I’d redirect the advertising dollars.”

Greenie:  “That seems like a pretty bold move.”

Jordan:  “Bold or not the decision to redirect ad dollars seems rather straightforward.   When venues become unpredictable or create controversy, then advertisers move on.  Look how quickly top-line advertisers took on the NFL over lack of a clear policy on domestic violence.”

Greenie: “And the NFL is far more popular than the NBA.”

Jordan: “The Hawks chose to focus on a black audience.   And they have every right to do so.”

Greenie:  “And the plan was successful except…

Jordan:  “… Except white fans found the game unpleasant or uncomfortable and decided not to attend.”

Greenie:  “So the owner wants to consider a different strategy.”

Jordan:  “Then the NBA, in its infinite wisdom, brands the owner a racist and forces him to sell his share of the team.”

Greenie: “That doesn’t seem right.”

Jordan:  “I wonder what would happen if Michael Jordan had asked the same question about the fans at Charlotte Hornets’ games?”

Greenie:  “I don’t know the mix of fans at the Hornet’s games but my guess is the reaction of the NBA would have been much different.”

Jordan: “I agree.”

Greenie:  “Seems to me the NBA doesn’t get it.   I wish them good luck.”

#84 Change Starts with Personal Responsibility

10 Wednesday Sep 2014

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Education Issues, Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products, Possible Solutions, Societal Issues

≈ Leave a comment

(Readers: Please note the blog is constructed as a story. While not all chapters are linked, after reading a few recent entries, you might want to start at the beginning. More about the blog and about the author. )

Scene:  JC, Greenie and Jordan continuing conversation about higher education.  Start of conversation entry #80.

Greenie:  “I think most everyone wants teachers and productive members of society, 122813_2140_15Education2.jpgnot prisoners.  But when all is said and done, how are we going to make this happen?”

JC:  “Jordan, I agree with Greenie.  This idea seems too ethereal to me.  The concept is great but are the concrete steps to implement?  We need a simple plan.”

Jordan:  “It is a big, abstract idea.  But we’ve already laid out two steps.  #1 is stop busing and use tax dollars for teachers.  #2 is trade the cost of incarcerating someone for more teachers.”

k14630609JC:  “So, back to my question.  What are the concrete steps to implement the two ideas?”

Jordan:  “To me the first step is for those disadvantaged to begin saying ‘Stop busing.  Use the money saved to improve our neighborhood schools.”

Greenie:  “Then what?  Each situation is going to be different, so the residents need to realize they might end up working closely with the school board.”

122813_2140_15Education1.jpgJC:  “Residents might have to work with the courts also.  Remember busing started implementing Brown vs. Board of Education (Topeka) and the repeal of Plessy vs. Ferguson (separate, but equal).

Jordan:  “Speaking of Ferguson…Ferguson, MO might be a good place to start this project.”

Greenie:  “Excellent location, if nothing else for the publicity.  Someone needs to check how much busing actually goes on in Ferguson but I like the location.”

JC:  “Residents are probably open to most any idea that gives them more control.”

Greenie:  “Plus the Justice Department is already investigating Ferguson so they might be open to the idea as well.”

Jordan:  “So now we have one possible location for a pilot program.  We need some more locations.”

JC:  “Jordan, what about getting with Justice for ideas?  Surely they have a ‘watch list’ for school districts that are not complying with the law.”

Jordan:  “Alright.  I’ve got a contact there I’ll call.”

Greenie:  “You know what I like about this idea?”

JC:  “OK, what do you like about this idea?”

Greenie:  “OK, wise guy.  The plan puts more control back with parents and the school district.”

JC:  “I like more control with parents.  But some of the school districts do not want integration.”

Jordan:  “This plan might give some districts an out from forced busing, which they should support.  I can’t blame parents for not wanting to have their kids bussed.  Busing is a waste of time and eats into kids’ study time and free time.”

School-Bus-ClipartGreenie:  “Tell me about the disruptive part.  My kids were two blocks from the neighborhood school and ended up being bussed.”

Jordan:  “How long was the ride?”

Greenie:  “30 minutes each way.  60 minutes each day on some bus when the kids were two blocks from school.  A lot of kids spend even more time on the bus.”

Jordan:  “You know what might help get the effort going?  A template for parents to follow.”

JC:  “Why not publish a template?  Conservative political groups have templates for legislators.  Aren’t they running the NC House and Senate?”

Jordan:  “Seems like it.  More ALEC templates than any home-grown legislation.”

Greenie:  “These groups are effective.  And they must think the public is incredibly stupid.  In the 2014 mid-terms Republican candidates in three different states ran TV ads their Democratic opponent was the last vote that made Obamacare law.”

JC:  “Being last three times on a single vote is hard to do.  But, hey Republicans have their own math.”

Greenie:  “Now, now.  Be nice.”

Jordan:  “I’ve got another one.  The Charlotte Observer published a letter to the editor from someone I know.  He is CEO of his father’s business.  The son can’t string two sentences together, let alone a coherent letter.  He used a template for the letter and added a few names to make it local.  And the paper published it.”

Greenie:  “Not often do I admit learning something from far-right Republicans, but in this case, we should take a lesson from them.”

JC:  “Let’s use their template idea.  We need to make sure the tone and text focus on moving forward and not rehash old issues.”

ladderGreenie:  “If we’re not careful, we’ll spend too much time talking about why the black community remains at the bottom of the economic ladder and not enough time looking at solutions.”

Jordan:  “What do you mean?”

JC:  “How many times have you heard or read that blacks were slaves, then subject to Jim Crow Laws.  As a result, blacks lost self-esteem and blah, blah, blah.”

Jordan:  “JC, aren’t you being overly harsh?  Isn’t a lot of that true?”

JC:  “My point is what you keep preaching, Jordan.  You can’t drive very fast looking through the rear-view mirror. “

Greenie:  “But all the info is true.”

JC:  “And so what?  Every other ethnic group has been discriminated against.  And guess what?  Every other ethnic group has moved on.”

Greenie:  “Point well taken.”

boiling_potJC:  “Put all the information, arguments, blame and whatever else you want in a pot, turn the heat to high and wait for it to boil.  When it’s finished boiling, there’s one thing left.” Jordan:  “That one thing is.”

JC:  “Personal responsibility.”

Greenie:  “Seems to me we are back to the adage ‘You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.”

JC:  “That’s exactly where we are.  Nothing of significance is going to happen to get blacks off the bottom rung of the economic ladder until the black community stands up and says, ‘We want to change.  Not whites want you to change.  We, the black community, want to change.  We would others to help us.”

Jordan:  “The first project could be rebuilding neighborhood schools.”

 

#83 What Do You Want to Pay for – One Prisoner or One Teacher?

06 Saturday Sep 2014

Posted by Jordan Abel in Education Issues, Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products, Possible Solutions, Societal Issues

≈ 1 Comment

(Readers: Please note the blog is constructed as a story. While not all chapters are linked, after reading a few recent entries, you might want to start at the beginning. More about the blog and about the author. )

Scene:  JC, Greenie and Jordan continuing conversation about higher education.  Start of conversation entry #80.

Greenie:  “Holistic respect.  Respect holistically.  You know, Jordan, even after having 010414_1635_16StudentsL2.jpglunch neither tag line rings.  We need something else.

JC:  “I like Aretha’s R-E-S-P-E-C-T but I don’t like holistic.  The idea of holistic is fine but we need a different term.  But let’s not get hung up on terms right now.  What’s next?”

Jordan:  “Next is trying to get support for the idea, whatever we call it.”

Greenie:  “You said something about a pilot program.  Surely some school district must be taking this approach already.”

Jordan:  “No doubt a few districts are.  But you know how provincial school districts are.”

010414_1635_16StudentsL1.jpgJC:  “Tell me about it.  Such-and-such an idea won’t work here because…well, because things are different here.”

Jordan:  “I can’t tell you how many times I heard that very phrase in Charlotte.  The resistance was especially strong if the idea worked some place north of the Mason-Dixon Line.”

JC:  “So are we implying the movement for more neighborhood schools needs to be grass-roots or at least start locally?”

Greenie:  “Ground up and driven by people who have the most to gain.”

JC:  “That group being…?”

Greenie:  “Who have we been taking about…the black community.  From my perspective, they have the most to lose without major changes to the education system and the most to gain with changes, especially neighborhood schools.”

Jordan:  “I agree.  The movement toward neighborhood schools and the argument about using a holistic-cost approach needs to come from the black community, not some think tank in Washington.”

JC:  “OK, then who’s going to take the lead on this effort?  The problem is complex and going to take several generations to fix.  Who’s going to convince people to have patience?”

Greenie:  “A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step.”

122213_1351_10GurusHous1.gifJordan:  “Did Confucius say that?”

JC:  “Jordan, you spent too many hours with those math problems and not enough time reading.  It was Lao Tzu.  I really wonder about you sometimes.”

Greenie:  “JC, don’t be so hard on little Jordan.  He can’t help it.  Bless his little heart.”

Jordan:  “Thanks for the sympathy Greenie.  You’re a tough crowd.  Besides, I think the problem of getting people to understand might be less complicated than you think.  Let’s break down the key parts.”

Greenie:  “Seems to me we can get more buy-in if we tie recommended actions to saving taxpayer dollars.  Keep the fuzzy stuff in the closet.”

JC:  “If we’re going to focus on benefits and cost…what do you call that Jordan?

Jordan:  “I call that too much time with warm and fuzzy books and not enough time learning quantitative analysis.  But the answer is ‘cost:benefit analysis.’”

School-Bus-ClipartJC:  “OK, we’re even.  The first issue should be a cost: benefit analysis of busing.  Make the case to trade dollars spent on busing for additional teachers or TA’s.”

Greenie:  “There are hard data on costs for busing.  The equation should be simple to understand.”

JC:  “For every $50k spent on busing – buying the bus, fuel, drivers, maintenance, insurance, whatever…the school district hires a new teacher for the neighborhood schools.”

Greenie:  “But only for neighborhood schools with a high percentage of poverty.”

Jordan:  “What else?”

PrisonerJC:  “Trading the cost of incarceration for education.  I’m still astounded that sending someone to prison for 5 years costs more than sending someone for a 4-year degree at Harvard or MIT.  That is so hard to believe.”

Greenie:  “I’m dumbfounded also.  But I think a more effective argument, and one that will be easier to get across, is taking the nearly $50k per year for incarceration and transferring that to public schools.  One prisoner equals one teacher.”

Black School TeacherJC:  “Keep the person out of prison, help them get an education and then a job and voila…you turn a tax expenditure into tax revenue.”

Greenie:  “One prisoner equals one teacher.  Even the most die-hard conservative ought to be able to understand that.”

(To be continued)

#82 Why Pay for Public Schools? 5 Years in Prison Costs Same as Degree at MIT

04 Thursday Sep 2014

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Education Issues, Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products, Possible Solutions, Societal Issues

≈ 1 Comment

(Readers: Please note the blog is constructed as a story. While not all chapters are linked, after reading a few recent entries, you might want to start at the beginning. More about the blog and about the author. )

Scene:  JC, Greenie and Jordan continuing conversation about higher education.  Start of conversation entry #80.

Greenie:  “What’s the real issue here?  Busing, separate but equal, quality 010414_1635_16StudentsL2.jpgneighborhood schools, or something else?”

JC:  “I’m confused too, Jordan.  What is the real issue?  And what do we need to do to address it?”

Jordan:  “Now we are getting someplace.  As a society we are great at treating symptoms and lousy at addressing the underlying causes.”

JC:  “OK, great Mr. Philosopher, explain to us mortals what you’re talking about.”

Greenie:  “Specifically related to schools or busing or education or whatever.  More to the point, please.”

Jordan:  “My view is the only sure-fire way out of poverty is education.”

122813_1403_12ThePoundD1.jpg JC:  “Agreed.”

Jordan:  “I also believe, based on many years empirical data in this country, and worldwide, that a  public-school system can deliver a high-quality education.”

Greenie:  “I agree.  We are all products of public primary and secondary schools.  And JC and I, unlike you Jordan, attended public universities for our advanced degrees.”

Jordan:  “I taught at a public university…or at least I was an adjunct.  So there.”

JC:  “Now that we have the public/private school backgrounds out of the way, what about recreating a credible, quality public-school system for K-12?  Make that K thru college.”

Jordan:  “I think that’s a good way to frame the issue?  ‘What’s required to recreate a credible, quality public-school system?’  I would add one element…affordability.  The system needs to be affordable for taxpayers and affordable for participants, especially at the college level.”

Greenie:  “Making it affordable is critical.  Have you checked tuition at some public universities?”

JC:  “Tuition rivals some middle-line private schools.”

Greenie:  “Jordan, are you suggesting we cut back on or even eliminate charters and private schools?”

Jordan:  “You know my feelings about charter schools.  Despite all the rhetoric, charters are a diversion of public tax dollars to the private sector.  Using tax dollar to fund charters is part of a long-term strategy to erode and eventually eliminate public schools.”

JC:  “Whoa, Jordan.  What about private schools?”

Jordan:  “If people want to pay for private schools, including parochial schools, I’m OK.  But…and this is an important but…”

Greenie:  “…no vouchers?”

Jordan:  “You got it.  You want to send your kid to private school?  OK but so subsidy from taxpayers.”

JC:  “What about home schooling?”

Jordan:  “I’m opposed to that as well.  As we talked about, parents can do all the home schooling they want after regular school hours.  If little Johnnie is as bright as the parents claim, then little Johnnie can soak all the information he wants after regular school hours.  Kids need to be exposed to more diversity, not less diversity.  Bright kids need to learn how to deal with others who aren’t as gifted.”

JC:  “Alright, what’s next?”

Jordan:  “The only way public schools are going to work effectively is to start with schools in the neighborhood.  Neighborhood schools allow kids to develop an emotional bond to the school.”

Greenie:  “Neighborhood schools mean no busing for most students.”

JC:  “What if the neighborhood has a high crime rate.  How are the kids going to get to school?”

Jordan:  “Here’s where society has an obligation.  We…collective we…have to protect the kids going to/from school.”

JC:  “I need to ask a question again about cost.  Who’s going to pay for all this?  I know the question sounds so Republican-like but who is going to pay for this?”

Greenie:  “Good question, JC.”

Jordan:  “It is a good question and a great lead-in to finding a solution.”

JC:  “…and that solution is?”

Jordan:  “A holistic approach to calculating cost.”

Greenie:  “Jordan, sounds like another abstract idea.  Washington have your brain muddied?”

Jordan:  “The approach might appear abstract but the approach is sound, and realistic.  To me using a holistic approach to cost is the only way we…again, collective we…are ever going to start making progress toward rebuilding a quality education system.”

JC:  “Why do you say that?”

122813_2140_15Education4.jpgJordan:  “A holistic approach allows all cost increases and all cost decreases to be combined.  Without a holistic approach, usually only a portion of the issue is addressed.”

Greenie:  “A holistic is an Interesting idea, but I need an example.  Still too abstract.”

Jordan:  “Alright.  Take the idea of what we’ve been discussing — credible, quality neighborhood schools.  What are the extra costs to achieve the goal?”

JC:  “More security in some neighborhoods.  Higher teacher pay.  Maybe rehabbing some schools.”

Jordan:  “What about the savings?”

Greenie:  “Fewer buses, less fuel, fewer bus drivers, more time before and after school for education and activities and probably lower crime.  And, eventually more productive members of society.”

Jordan:  “Take crime.  How much it cost to incarcerate someone?”

JC:  “How much does it cost to keep someone in prison for a year?  Don’t know.”

Jordan:  “Try $40-50,000 per year.”

JC:  “So over a 5-year period, the cost is $200-$250k.  Over a 10-year period, the cost MIT-logoto society is say $400-$500k.  So if we send someone away for five years, it’s the same cost as an undergraduate education at Harvard or MIT?  And that’s without any financial help from the school. I never thought about it that way.”

Greenie:  “You mean as a society we have a choice – send someone to prison for 5 years or pay full tuition, room, board, books and everything else for someone to attend Harvard or MIT?”

JC:  “I’ll take paying for someone to go Harvard.”

Jordan:  “I’ll take MIT.”

Greenie:  “We figured that.”

Jordan:  “Anyway, now you are beginning to see how the choices we make as a society affect us in different ways.  A holistic approach attempts to consider all implications of a decision, not just a few parts.”

Greenie:  “For the same cost to taxpayers, we can put someone in prison for 5 years and teach him or her few, if any, skills that are useful upon exiting or send someone to school and end up with a great education.  Duh.  Seems simple enough to me.”

Jordan:  “Let’s be realistic.  Not everyone who goes to prison comes out as totally untrained.  And not everyone who goes to prison is smart enough to attend university.  But many people are and as a society we are wasting that potential.”

JC:  “Interesting approach. Spend money in one area and avoid spending money in another area.  How are we going to get that point across?  So many politicians and voters focus on today and 10-second sound bites and not focus on the longer term.”

Jordan:  “What segment of society is affected most by lack of quality, credible neighborhood schools?”

Greenie:  “The black community, I guess.  But the issue really applies to a larger portion of society.”

JC:  “Greenie, you’re right.  Jordan has been outlining a program to help the black community get off the bottom rung of the economic ladder.”

Greenie:  “Is this holistic cost approach part of that program?”

Jordan:  “Implied but not overtly detailed.”  Maybe it should be.”

JC:  “Jordan, you used one word to summarize the program.”

Greenie:  “What word was that?”

JC:  “R-E-S-P-E-C-T.”

Aretha-aretha-franklin-27121751-1280-1024Greenie:  “You don’t sing like Aretha but its a great one-word tag line.  A two-word tag line might be “Holistic R-E-S-P-E-C-T.”

Jordan:  “Holistic respect is going to some explaining.  But it does capture the essence of the issue.”

JC:  “Holistic respect doesn’t ring, as they say.  Let’s have lunch and see how it sounds after some food.”

 

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Affordable Solutions
  • Back Asswards Thinking
  • Background
  • Background Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Benefits of Revolution
  • Causes of the Revolution
  • Common Sense Policies
  • Corporate Policy
  • Definitions
  • Diversions
  • Economics
  • Education Issues
  • Federal Budget
  • General Motors
  • Gov't Policy
  • Infrastructure & Fixed Fuel Prices
  • Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products
  • Lessons of Revolution
  • Personal Stories
  • Possible Solutions
  • Post Trump Presidency
  • Rebranding Black Community
  • Sense Check
  • Societal Issues
  • Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Tech Tsunami
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • usrevolution5
    • Join 29 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • usrevolution5
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...