Readers: this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020). Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution. More about the Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1. List and general description of entries to date.
Note: most entries are formatted as conversations. Characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations. Profile of characters (see link at top of page). You’ll catch on quickly. Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.
Scene: Jordan’s office, Washington, DC. Conversation began Entry #289.
Gr
eenie: “Ready for another idea how to really make America great again?”
JC: “Yep. We could beat to death the idea of federally funded elections. Why don’t we tackle something less controversial?”
Greenie: “You mean like Jordan’s suggestion to bring back conscription?”
JC: “Why not? The alt-right crowd insists that only those who salute the flag, serve in the military and own guns are patriotic. I’m sure the alt-right will support conscription.”
Greenie: “Reinstating conscription should be a slam dunk. I learned that term watching the Final Four. Anyway, think of all the hard-liners who’ve had stellar military careers.”
Jordan: “You mean like Trump, Limbaugh, Hannady, and the former right-wing truthsayer, Bill O’Reilly.”
JC: “What a list of potential endorsers for conscription…except I don’t think any of them served in the military.”
Greenie: “Hold on. Trump went to military school. If you don’t think that was tougher than being in the real military, just ask the Donald…whatever.”
Jordan: “What’s as bad as their military experience is their education. O’Reilly is the only one with any kind of education. Limbaugh and Hannady aren’t even qualified to blow stuff out their you know what.”
Gre
enie: “Jordan, pulleeeze. Be a bit more diplomatic, will you?”
Jordan: “Well, Limbaugh dropped out after one year at some Missouri teacher’s college and Hannady bounced around three different schools and never did graduate.”
JC: “Alright, lets remove tongue from cheek and get serious. What are the benefits of conscription?”
Jordan: “First, let’s be clear. Conscription would allow either military service or non-military service with Federal agencies approved by the Selective Service.”
Greenie: “Just so I understand, you including women?”
JC: “Why not? If combat military service is not required, then why not include women?”
Jordan: “For now, we’ll include both men and women.”
Greenie: “How long do you have to serve?”
Jordan: “Two years…and then some sort of standby reserve in case there’s a crisis. But the reserve wouldn’t require any weekend training or anything like that.”
Greenie: “Eligibility at what age?”
Jordan: “Eligible at 18 but must begin service by say age 26. A person could get a deferment to attend trade school or college but would need to start by age 26.”
JC: “What if a woman got married and had a kid…or just had a kid? Would she still have to serve?”
Greenie: “Now, I’ll ask, ‘Why not?’ She could always service in a non-military capacity. Just giving some people an easy way out doesn’t seem fair.”
JC: “Then what kind of jobs would qualify outside the military?”
Jordan: “Federal agencies that have operations in most parts of the country. Agencies that serve people locally or work with the states to service people locally.”
Greenie: “You mean such as EPA, part of Interior, Education, HUD?”
Jordan: “All those agencies work.”
JC: “What about FEMA?”
Jordan: “FEMA’s a good add.”
Greenie: “Think how much more effective FEMA could be with a staff highly trained to help manage disaster relief.”
Jordan: “Same with EPA. There are lots of areas where an ‘EPA corps’ as it were, could help gather data or fix an issue before it becomes difficult and costly to solve. Just like that old commercial, ‘pay me now or pay me later.’ But later is almost always much more expensive.”
Greenie: “Are all the jobs we’re talking about outdoorsy kind of jobs?”
Jordan: “Not at all. The military has lots of jobs for non-combat personnel…and many are like office jobs.”
JC: “I can hear it now. Some people are going to claim what we’re proposing will be taking away jobs from others. Or worse yet, conscription will interrupt little Johnnie’s or little Susie’s career that mommy and daddy paid so much to prepare them for. How are we going to counter that argument?”
Jordan: “Give mommy and daddy the Bronx cheer. Really, there’s a number key benefits that stem from conscription. Most obvious is helping fix some of the country’s problems that kept getting put off by politics. #2 benefit, being forced to live in a disciplined environment, at least during the ‘basic training’ period; #3, being forced to learn to work with a team. I’m always amazed at how many young adults have never really been forced to work in a team. Even if they end up in a non-military job, everyone who goes through some type of basic training will have a much better understanding of the value of teamwork…and an inkling of how the military works. #4 benefit…”
JC: “…Let me try. #4, forced diversity. Exposure to a wide range of people and backgrounds never hurt anyone. Maybe we, that is societal we, could become a bit more civil if we understood others’ perspectives. Brilliant statement, huh?”
Greenie: “We know what you meant. This idea of conscription is starting to seem obvious but I know better. What about exemptions from serving? You know, exemptions for some serious medical condition…like bone spurs. I mean is everyone going to be forced to serve or will the loopholes be large enough to drive a truck through?”
Jordan: “Clearly, some people will be unable to serve. But the program should start with the assumption that everyone serves and then carve out as few exemptions as possible.”
JC: “You know, the time might be right to reinstitute conscription. Since the Revenge Revolution people seem more willing to explore old and new ways of trying to solve problems.”
Greenie: “I admit, when you first mentioned conscription, I thought, ‘that’s really a stupid idea.’ But, as I said, I’m starting to come around. Good idea, Jordan.”
Jordan: “Glad you think so. The idea of conscription, like the idea of federally funded elections, seems to have a foundation that’s sound and can contribute to really making America great again. But each idea needs a lot more work on the details. And, now, please excuse me. I need a break.”
(Continued)
Greenie: “Jordan, that’s quite a list of ideas about how to make America great again. We’ve got to call this project something else but let’s not spend time on that now. Which item on the list seems like a good place to start?”
JC: “I’m no legal scholar…and no comments please…but it does seem as if there aren’t any real legal barriers. Political barriers, yes, but not legal barriers.”
JC: “Let’s say there’s no major legal issue. Then how should Federal funds be allocated to the candidates?”
Jordan: “Good points. Try this. Presidential elections get the full $10/head funding. Off-year elections get $5/head allocated.”
JC: “Let me try the math. If I remember Ester’s Algebra class, that would be 200X+435X=$1,700,000,000. Using my hand-dandy phone, x equals almost $2.7 million. So Senate races get about $5.4 million and House races about $2.7 million.”
JC: “3rd-party candidates?”
Greenie: “Now, JC, I mean really. What’s a few billion in a trillion-dollar Federal budget – a rounding error? I agree the approach seems expensive until you begin to add up all the hidden costs with today’s approach to funding elections…and all the backroom deals connected to the funding.”
Greenie: “Because funds will be limited, the approach will likely also force candidates to get out on the campaign trail and meet the voters. Maybe we’ll get fewer negative ad blitzes and more time on the campaign trail.”
Greenie: “Oh, you mean like South Carolina’s Mick Mulvaney? What chutzpah. He bragged to a group of bankers that before he became part of the Trump Administration, he only talked to lobbyists who paid him. Wonder if he stopped the practice when he became director of OMB and consumer protection bureau for Trump? Pardon me — that seems like a rhetorical question.”
Greenie: “He retired from the House. I guess you call it retired if not seeking in November 2018 qualifies as retiring.”
JC: “C’mon, you love it. Now what’s the idea?”
Greenie: “Let’s keep in mind the past does provide some guidance to the future. You do agree with that, don’t you, Jordan?”
Jordan: “For one, Greenie’s articles about the Revenge Revolution. We might have more understanding about the causes of the Revenge Revolution than anyone in Congress, especially incoming members or staffers.”
(Following is the list from the brainstorming session about how to really make America great again. Over the coming blog entries, a number of these ideas will be discussed in more detail.)
Gelly: “Jordan, you’ve done it again?”
Gelly: “You mean the executives of the company that’s relocating. But I never though about the cost of these relocations to the people where the company left and even…”
Senior executives and sha
Many 
Taxpayers 
Do these relocations create a net gain to US societ
