• Home
  • Booklets/Grouped Entries
  • Tech Tsunami
  • List of Entries to Date
  • About the Author

usrevolution5

~ USA Headed for a 5th Revolution! Why?

usrevolution5

Monthly Archives: July 2017

#258 Going after the Donald: Collusion? An Illusion. Better to Follow the Money

29 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ 2 Comments

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s Washington office following meeting with Greenie and JC.  Series with JC and Greenie starts Entry #244 and ends Entry #257.  

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Enjoyed the visit with JC and Greenie.  You guys are great to be around.  Always interesting conversation.”

Jordan:  “Agreed.  I really enjoy them.”

Gelly:  “Speaking of interesting…I heard something about you at the briefing on brainwashing.”

Jordan:  “Good I hope.  Good about me, not about someone brainwashing me.”

Gelly:  “Good about you, yes but the details were a bit murky.”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Alright, what was it?”

Gelly:  “Someone told me you were involved behind the scenes as part of the investigation of Trump’s finances.”

Jordan:  “Now, who told you that?”

Gelly:  “The person asked me not to say.  Well, is it true?”

Jordan:  “Yes, it’s true.  I guess no need to keep my involvement a secret now.  It’s been a while since the special prosecutor laid bare all the financial shenanigans of Trump and family.”

Gelly:  “So, exactly what was your role?”

Jordan:  “One of the lawyers on the special prosecutor’s team knew my background and asked me to look at some deals Trump made.”

Gelly:  “I thought some of the lawyers were finance experts.”

sense-checkJordan:  “The lawyers on the team had a lot of experience prosecuting illegal financial transactions.  They wanted someone who had experience constructing models for starting and operating a business.  Part of the investigation was to reverse engineer Trump’s deals.  They wanted to know how the deal was constructed.  Knowing that would help them understand who was really benefitting.”

Gelly:  “Why you?  You’re not a real estate guy?”

Jordan:  “True but most of the modeling work I’ve done has started with a blank piece of paper.  The lawyers thought my approach might help them discover where to begin to probe further.  The deals were complicated but money always needs a path to follow…and the path was what they were looking for.”

Gelly:  “Were you successful?”

Jordan:  “I’ll never really know for sure.  The team seemed pleased with my recommendations.”

SecretGelly:  “OK, what did you find out that didn’t make the papers?”

Jordan:  “C’mon Gelly, you know I can’t give you any specifics.”

Gelly:  “Then just tell me whatever good stuff you can.”

Jordan:  “Trump family ties to the Russians were far more extensive than anyone realized when the investigation started…and for the most part what was publicly discussed.” 

Gelly:  “I’m listening.  More, please.”

Jordan:  “There was a lot of talk about Trump colluding with Russians during the 2016 election.  Clearly there were lots of misdeeds and some felonies.  However, when the prosecution team started digging into what happened, the idea of collusion became the sideshow compared to the illegal financial transactions.”

Gelly:  “Why does it always seem best to follow the money?”

Duck with MoneyJordan:  “Following the money is a great place to start.  For Trump, money was the, capital THE, primary measure of success.  Trump was a wanna be rich guy.  Really obsessed with being perceived as rich.”

Gelly:  “If the money came from Russia, then where’d the money go?”

Jordan:  “Virtually all the golf courses were purchased using Russian money…and most of the money probably was laundered.”

Gelly:  “Golf courses, you mean like Mar-a-Lago and that place in New Jersey where he kept running off to?  Places like that?”

Golf Bet 1
Jordan:
  “Yes.  He even bought a country club in Charlotte and renamed it Trump something or other.”

Gelly:  “How’d you find out it was Russian money?”

Jordan:  “Like most everything about Trump and family, they couldn’t keep their mouths shut.  Before the Donald became a serious candidate for president, Junior bragged to some Charlotte locals about the Russians being their source of capital to buy the golf courses.”

Gelly:  “Another example of the apple not falling far from the tree.  The Donald couldn’t stop bragging and neither could Junior.  It’s almost as if they wanted to leave bread crumbs for the ducks to follow.”

Trump KingJordan:  “Being naïve and a braggart is not a good combination if you’re involved in criminal activity.  Even worse when you think you’re king.  Donald and the family were naïve about how Washington politics and incredibly naïve about the consequences of shady international financing.  Consequences not just from the government but consequences from the lenders.”

Gelly:  “So the Russians fund the golf courses and resorts like Mar-a-Lago.  What about the hotels and apartment buildings?”

Jordan:  “Same deal.  Keep in mind that after the Trump debacle in Atlantic City where his casinos when bankrupt and he stiffed creditors, no major US bank would lend money to him.”

Gelly:  “So he turns to less credible sources.  But why the Russians?  Why would they lend him money if he’s such a bad risk?”

Jordan:  “Hold that question.  I need to take a quick break.” 

(Continued)     

 

Advertisement

#257 Who Took Out the Donald? (Were Some Trump Supporters Brainwashed?) (Part 14/14)

17 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ 3 Comments

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington.  (Series “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.) 

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Alright, we’ve got our coffee refills.  Now, JC, why do you think many of the Trump supporters were brainwashed?”

JC:  “Simple.”

Greenie:  “OK. I’m game.  Why is the answer so simple?”

JC:  “My research indicated the foundation for most brainwashing was the constant use of declarative statements.”

Jordan:  “You mean like my mother used to say — ‘Do this.  Don’t do that.’”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “Now, Jordan, that was not nice.  Besides your mother’s behavior was part of the cultural.  She didn’t consider that brainwashing.”

Jordan:  “OK, I’ll forget I said that.”

JC:  “A key to brainwashing is always respond to a question without any hesitation and without any inkling the answer might not be correct.  If you want to brainwash someone, start by acting as if your answers are always correct, even if their boldface lies.”

Gelly:  “So, if I ask you a question and you want to start brainwashing me, you respond with a declarative statement, whether true or not.  As a brainwasher, your focus is to make sure there is little if any room for the ‘brainwashees,’ as it were, to be able to think for themselves.  Provide an answer and leave no room for questions.”

BrainwashedGreenie:  “If I understand correctly, as the brainwasher you want your declarative statement to reinforce whatever your position is and not have the ‘brainwashee’ think about possible answers.  Have I got it right?”

JC:  “Yes, it is important to reinforce your position, even if the position has no basis in fact and is completely based made-up, or as the Trump Administration liked to call them, ‘alternative facts.’”

Jordan:  “The brainwashing theory sounds OK but how about an example or two.”

Gelly:  “JC, may I try to give an example, please?”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “Fire away.”

Gelly:  “Back before Trump became a serious candidate, he claimed president Obama was born in Kenya and therefore not a legitimate president.”

Greenie:  “That’s seems like a good example.”

Gelly:  “Trump continued to repeat that claim despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.  Trump even claimed, or at least implied, that the birth announcement in the Honolulu paper was false.  So, when Obama was born…in Kenya, of course…there was a group that knew he would become president.  To make sure the newborn Kenyan kid was eligible, the group wanting him to be president put a phony birth announcement in the Honolulu paper.  That story makes perfect sense to me?  I mean really, what idiot would believe that?”

JC:  “Think about all the people who did believe it.  In addition to Trump, the gold standard for objective and credible reporting, Fox News, kept repeating the story.  And, of course, the Rush Man joined O’Reilly, Hannity, Breitbart and their ilk in reinforcing the bogus claim.  And what happened?  Many Republicans were brainwashed.  How many?”

Birth CertificateGreenie:  “If I recall correctly, in the summer of 2016, more than 40% of all Republicans still believed Obama was born outside the US.”

Jordan:  “Can that number be right, JC?  More than 40%?  What were these people thinking?”

JC:  “The number is right…it was a little over 40% who bought in to the lie.  My study suggested that the claim was so outrageous and so bizarre that only someone who’d been brainwashed would believe it.”

StatisticsJordan:  “Let me give another example.  Trump kept saying none of the employment, income and range of other statistics provided by the Federal government could be trusted.”

JC:  “These claims are in addition to Trump’s declarative statements that global-warming was a conspiracy of what 3,000 scientists…sorry for the sidebar.”

Jordan:  “As I was saying…I have an acquaintance, a former a high-school history teacher, who supported Trump and claimed no statistics from the government were credible.  Here’s a guy that was supposed to be teaching our kids to think and understand how our country was formed and has continued to evolve.  Whether he liked it or not, the very foundation of the United States was and is the Federal government.  So what did he spout?  That any information provided by the Federal government cannot be trusted.”

Gelly:  “Fortunately, he’s no longer teaching.”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Let’s pause for just a minute and look at some history.  Over the years some of the political claims in the US have been outrageous and patently false.  Yet, the country survived.  And so have a lot of other countries survived with brainwashing and false information.  What was different about this effort to brainwash?”

JC:  “Actually, nothing was different.  Now, let’s look at what happened in these countries every time a large percentage of the population got brainwashed.”

Greenie:  “You mean like what happened in Germany and Italy prior to and during WWII?  OK, so we lost a few relatives.  More like 6,000,000 Jews.  Like what happened in Russia under Stalin.  And maybe like what happened in the US south leading up to and during the Civil War?  C’mon, these were only people that got enslaved or murdered.  What’s the issue?”

Confused Clip ArtJordan:  “I know you’re being serious and your point is spot on.  What type event followed each time there was widespread brainwashing?”

Greenie:  “Some type of anarchy and sometimes is was really, really ugly.  The anarchy wasn’t some upset guys just hanging around a coffee shop.  There were real hangings.”

Jordan:  “JC, you’re the expert.  Why does anarchy often follow the brainwashing?  Why not a peaceful transition?”

RobotJC:  “When brainwashed, the populous acts more like robots, not really thinking about what they’re doing.  Then at some point, things start to get so far out of whack that more and more people get jolted back to reality.”

Gelly:  “Like having an ‘ah ha’ moment?”

JC:  “Exactly.  After the ‘ah ha’ moment, people feel duped and betrayed.  They are so frustrated and so angry at the country’s leaders…and even themselves…that a peaceful transition is nearly impossible.”

Jordan:  “I can buy that logic for most egregious situations.  But do you think the same type anger occurred after the FBI took out Trump?  After all, the main culprit was gone.”

Greenie:  “So you’re asking why we still had a Revenge Revolution.  Once Trump was out, why didn’t people just let go and move on?”

ScrewedJC:  “My view is the Trump supporters also felt duped, really screwed, by a lot of Republican members of the House and Senate, state representatives and even some local politicians.  Many of these politicians supported….and even enhanced the Trump lies. A good example is how many of these Republican politicians kept claiming for a long time that Donnie Junior’s meeting with the Russians was no big deal and it was just part of a witch hunt.”

Greenie:  “Then a lot of Republicans began to realize the significance of the meeting.  It was the intent, not the outcome.”

Used Car royalty-free-car-salesman-clipart-illustration-443283Jordan:  “Trump’s argument was so incredibly phony – nothing of value came out of the meeting.  Trust me, he claimed.  Well, Junior, try your logic on the police after you tried to rob a bank but the walked away empty handed.  ‘Gee, officer, I’m not guilty of attempted robbery because I didn’t the money.’  The officer replies, ‘Excuse me, Donnie Junior but attempted robbery is a felony.  Do you understand?’”

Gelly:  “His agreement to meet the Russians also violated some statutes affecting national security.  So why did it seem to take people a long time to understand what was really going on?”

Temper TantrumJC:  “Brainwashing is very effective…up to a point.  Finally, at least for a lot of people, the situation becomes so out of kilter that the regular brain kicks back in.  When many of the Republicans finally woke up to the Trump shenanigans, they had become so angry they couldn’t just let it go.  Even though Trump was gone by then, people still felt the need to revolt and throw out many of the Republican politicians.”

Greenie:  “So as part of throwing da bums out, we got the Revenge Revolution.  And, now, JC, we need to have our own revolt and get out of here.  It’s been a pleasure.”

Gelly:  “Thanks very much for staying after I got back.  Come back soon, please.” 

Jordan: “Come back any time.”      

 

 

#256 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 13) (Were some Trump voters brainwashed?)

09 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington.  (Series “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.) 

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Wow, what a pleasant surprise.  Two civilized people in the office.  Didn’t think you’d still be here.”

JC:  “It was tough to put up with Jordan this long, but we survived.”

Greenie:  “Tell us where you’ve been Gelly…well, tell us what you can.”

Gelly:  “The briefing was about an upcoming Congressional hearing studying the Trump Administration.”

010414_1635_16TeachingS1.jpgJC:  “More about scandals?  That seems pretty well researched by now.”

Gelly:  “No, the study is a bit unusual for a Congressional committee.  The topic is understanding why so many initial Trump supporters continued to support him despite the widespread scandals and his behavior that was considered so un-presidential by almost all standards.”

Greenie:  “Is the study bi-partisan?  I know that since the Revenge Revolution Congress has shown more willingness to work across the aisle, but the study could be a resistance point for many Republicans.”

Jordan:  “I agree.  What’s the rationale for rehashing the impact of Trump’s behavior on the populous?

Gelly:  “The underlying theme…if I interpreted the briefing correctly…is that somehow a very high percentage of the initial Trump supporters seemed to be brainwashed.  The study will attempt to confirm the premise…and if confirmed, then attempt to understand how they were brainwashed.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “I agree it’s unusual for a Congressional committee to be exploring such a topic.  Is the hearing going to be open to the public?”

Gelly:  “No decision as of yet.  Obviously a very sensitive topic, even with Trump out of office.”

Jordan:  “Any restriction on talking about the hearing?”

Gelly:  “For now we’re supposed to be discreet and limit the number of people we talk to about it.  But no outright prohibition.”

JC:  “So you won’t be put on double-secret probation if you talk to Greenie and me about it?”

Gelly:  “You guys are OK for the general information.  But as I know you will, please be extremely discreet in discussing this with anyone else…at least until we get further instructions.”

TurtleneckJC:  “Any idea what sources of data will be used for the study, aside from our expert witness here?”

Jordan:  “I’m not sure why I’m even on the short list for prospective witnesses.”

JC:  “Maybe you’ll be a subject of the study.  Just kidding.  Actually, brainwashing a portion of the population is not all that unusual.”

Jordan:  “OK, I’m game, tell me your theory.”

JC:  “In grad school I wrote a paper about how certain religions have been able to effectively brainwash followers.”

Greenie:  “Interesting topic.  I don’t think you ever told me about the paper.”

PreachJC:  “My conclusion was that people who follow religions that preach or instruct congregants to follow strict rules or believe that certain statements are absolutes that should not be questioned…the people who continue to follow the religion have been brainwashed.”

Greenie:  “By that definition, then you’re saying the ‘fundamentalists’ of most every major religion have been brainwashed.  In the US, that covers the more hard-core Christians, Jews and Muslims.”

Gelly:  “Don’t fundamentalists of each religion believe that only they have all the answers and you must follow certain rules and never question certain absolutes?”

JC:  “Yes, and those that don’t stand-up and salute are branded as categorically wrong.”

Jordan:  “Did your study include any non-religious examples?”

JC:  “Lots of them, although I had to limit the scope of the paper.  Otherwise, I never would have graduated.  When you really begin to delve into the topic, you discover that a number of segments of the population appear to have been brainwashed.  People who seem to be brainwashed include many categories – buyers of commercial products, other family members, political parties…its surprising how widespread brainwashing really appears to be.”

AppleGelly:  “You mean like people who insist on buying only Apple products, even though Apple costs more and might not perform as well?  Or those people who vote only for one party no matter how flawed the candidate?  Are you considering these people brainwashed?”

JC:  “Exactly.  I know some of this might sound like good marketing…and to some extent brainwashing probably is good marketing.  What really surprised me, though, was the predilection to brainwashing was not correlated to IQ.  Brainwashing seemed correlated more closely with personality type.”

Greenie:  “You mean the ‘down-2-over-4’ personalities who insist that everything must be just so.  No deviating from the standard or you will be punished.  That kind of personality?”

Gelly:  “They seem like they’re brainwashed.  What about people who are not ‘down-2-over-4’ types?”

Connect DotsJC:  “Another group that seemed prone to brainwashing was the group that ‘can’t connect the dots.’  The ‘no-dots’ crowd seems to view each event as discreet and somehow not linked.  They cannot fathom that somehow someone might be manipulating them.”

Jordan:  “What about predilection to brainwashing among different cultures?”

JC:  “Cultures that seem to exhibit more structured behaviors and those that are dominated by a very structured religion seem more prone.”

BrainwashedGreenie:  “The idea of modern-day mass brainwashing is scary stuff.  I never really considered the possibility being so widespread.  I mean, there’s always been some portion of the political parties that was effectively brainwashed.  The old Blue-dog Democrats, for example, and the more recent alt-right Republicans.  But you’re paper implied a higher percentage of the population.”

Gelly:  “Did your study determine the method used for brainwashing?”

JC:  “I’ll give you my conclusion after I get a coffee refill.  Greenie, I know we said we were out of here but let’s stay a few more minutes, OK?”

Greenie:  “Alright by me as long as you’re buying the refill.  Wonder why I didn’t know about this paper.”

(Continued)

#255 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 12)

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington a few days after the dinner meeting with Gelly, JC and Greenie.  (Series “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.) 

JC:  “Jordan, how ‘bout another cup of coffee.  Then Greenie and I need to blow this pop stand.”

Jordan:  “That’s an expression I haven’t heard in years.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “I’d like a coffee, too, please.  By the way, where’s Gelly?”

Jordan:  “At some briefing about an upcoming Congressional hearing.  I guess I’m on the short list to testify.”

JC:  “Well, Greenie, such company we keep.  Mr. Big Shot you want a coffee as well?”

Jordan:  “Please.  And I haven’t been called yet, so there.”

(Everyone gets coffee)

Greenie:  “Let’s try to wrap up the conversation about who took out the Donald.  I’ve got one more angle that I’d like to discuss.”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “You suggesting it wasn’t the FBI…but somebody else?”

Greenie:  “I’m more focused on why that who.  I’ll go with the FBI until we find out otherwise.  My angle is about the Donald’s mental state.”

JC:  “you mean like he was going crazy and the Feds had to protect the country?”

Greenie:  “Crazy, yes, but not the usual personality flaws everyone seems to remember.”

JC:  “If not narcissism, bullying, insecurity and a bunch of other stuff, then what?”

trump-scowlGreenie:  “I think the real issue was early-stage dementia.  It wasn’t very bad before the election.  Then the deterioration accelerated once he was in office.  It was like his brain was on a ski slope headed downhill fast.”

JC:  “We’ve talked about this before, right?  Or have I got Alzheimer’s?”

Greenie:  “Yes, we’ve talked about it.  But it was more as a sidebar.  I don’t think we gave his mental condition enough consideration.”

percent.pngJordan:  “Alright.  I know his father, Fred Trump, had Alzheimer’s.  There’s also data indicating a higher probability of being inflicted if a parent has had Alzheimer’s.  Assuming your prognosis is correct, do you really think the dementia was having that much of an effect?”

Greenie:  “Think about his behavior the first six months.  There seemed to a marked deterioration in his ability to stay focused on anything.”

U TurnJC:  “And think about the tweets?  He’d take one position one day and then a few days later he’d do a U-turn and contradict himself.  Then he’d claim he never sent the first tweet.  I agree he seemed to have less and less control over his emotions.”

Greenie:  “I still shake my head when I think of his tweets about Mika Brzezinski.  The content was insulting, the statements were lies.  Here’s a president spending time tweeting about a couple of cable news talking heads while his signature legislative proposal, repealing Obamacare, was getting ready to die in the Senate.  He could not seem to comprehend what was important.”

Jordan:  “All but the hard-core Republicans thought his behavior with Brzezinski was way out of line.”

Greenie:  “Keep thinking about his actions in late spring, early summer 2017.   What else did the Donald do that was scary mentally?”

092615_2031_Characters12.gifJC:  “Oh, nothing more than insulting heads of state, insulting the mayor of London and then disclosing Israeli secrets to the Russians.  Oops, I forgot he effectively gave the finger to his own cabinet members by regularly contradicting them publicly.  Then, he attempted to trash any media that questioned anything about the administration.  What was really kooky was the wrestling video aimed at CNN.  Shall I go on?”

Jordan:  “Greenie when you asked the question about the Donald’s mental state, I thought of a different incident.  The incident continues to stand out for me as an example of loss of control.”

Greenie:  “What have we missed?”

Jordan:  “I know the incident might sound trivial compared to some of the public insults of heads of state…and it might be trivial.  What sticks in my mind as a loss of control…more than any other incident…was him driving a golf cart on the green at Bedminster, NJ.”

Golf CartJC:  “I sorta remember that incident but why do you think driving a cart on the green is so important?”

Jordan:  “Trump owned, or at least had his name attached to a number of high-end golf courses.”

Greenie:  “Didn’t he buy Doral in Miami?  My folks used to play there occasionally.”

Jordan:  “He owned Doral.  You guys know my former life included lots of time playing golf, working with the PGA and playing an occasional round with a touring pro…at some very nice golf courses.  Golf has a strict set of rules and etiquette that proper golfers follow.”

JC:  “Get to the point, please.”

Jordan:  “I can’t think of worse behavior on a golf course than driving a cart on the green.”

JC:  “OK, so Trump was rude and broke rules.  Tell me something new.”

Temper TantrumGreenie:  “Jordan’s point, I think, is that Trump had spent all this time and money trying to build credibility with the high-end golfing community.  Then in one fell swoop he managed to alienate almost all the people he was trying to impress.  So the question is ‘why would anyone behave like some spoiled brat and do that?’”

JC:  “So he started destroying the very thing he was obsessed about building.  I know Alzheimer’s does destroy one’s ability to be disciplined and logical.  Without the effect of Alzheimer’s, I agree, why would anyone be so stupid?”

Jordan:  “I like the golf example because it’s not about politics, not about collusion with the Russians, not about money laundering…well, not about shady financial dealings anyway.  None of the ‘he said,’ ‘she said’ allegations.  No controversial media coverage.  The driving-on-the-green incident might not be so obvious to non-golfers but it’s clean and simple.  Just straightforward behavior that demonstrated complete lack of self-control and lack of understanding consequences.”

Greenie:  “So, you’re saying the FBI viewed the golf-cart-on-the-green incident as non-political behavior confirming his instability.  The icing on the cake, if you will.   Then, the FBI decided he was too unstable and it had to take him out.  If that’s you’re argument, I’ll buy it.”

JC:  “So will I, Jordan.”

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGreenie:  “Now, we’re out of here.  Please tell Gelly we said hello…and not to take you too seriously.”

Jordan:  “Don’t worry, she doesn’t take me too seriously.  And, I think she just walked in the office.  Stay a couple more minutes and see what she has to say about the upcoming hearing.  Besides, she’ll enjoy the chat.”

JC:  “OK, but we do have to get going very soon.”

(Continued)

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Affordable Solutions
  • Back Asswards Thinking
  • Background
  • Background Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Benefits of Revolution
  • Causes of the Revolution
  • Common Sense Policies
  • Corporate Policy
  • Definitions
  • Diversions
  • Economics
  • Education Issues
  • Federal Budget
  • General Motors
  • Gov't Policy
  • Infrastructure & Fixed Fuel Prices
  • Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products
  • Lessons of Revolution
  • Personal Stories
  • Possible Solutions
  • Post Trump Presidency
  • Rebranding Black Community
  • Sense Check
  • Societal Issues
  • Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Tech Tsunami
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • usrevolution5
    • Join 29 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • usrevolution5
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...