• Home
  • Booklets/Grouped Entries
  • Tech Tsunami
  • List of Entries to Date
  • About the Author

usrevolution5

~ USA Headed for a 5th Revolution! Why?

usrevolution5

Monthly Archives: July 2023

485. We Republicans Are for Your Personal Freedom Except….

24 Monday Jul 2023

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Post Trump Presidency, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Welcome to a discussion about the upcoming 5th Revolution in the US, which I’ve titled the “Revenge Revolution.” For more about the Revenge Revolution and the author, Entry #1.  Periodically I write a “sense check” to assess whether a revolution in the US is possible or whether the entire exercise is based on a statistical aberration — i.e., a roughly 50-year cycle between major upheavals in the US Entry #476 was the most recent “sense check.”

BEGIN ENTRY #485: For years Republicans have claimed to be the party of small government, personal freedom, fiscal responsibility, and protection of individual rights. You know, Republicans were protecting the American public from those nasty liberals that were always taking away rights from you and trying to control your personal life.

If you believe in honesty, integrity and protection of your rights, vote Republican. To be a true patriot, you must vote for a Republican.

Like everything else in a Republican Party ensconced in the Trump-world bubble, words take on opposite meanings. If the dictionary definition is “up,” then in Trump-world the meaning is “down.” “Good” means “bad” and truth is a rare commodity.

Well, the list is long of lies spouted by Trump and his Republicans lap dogs. The latest effort by Republicans to “protect individual rights” is, no surprise, really an effort to take away individual rights. The effort to take away rights is being pursued on two fronts.

#1 is several Republican state attorneys general are securing or attempting to secure, unredacted medical records for women who had an abortion in a state where abortion is legal but reside in a state where abortion is illegal.

Could someone please tell me when a state attorney general – 99.999% of whom are not licensed to practice medicine – all of sudden gained the right to review unredacted personal medical records? Is the AG going to offer a 2nd opinion about a proposed procedure? Somehow passing around one’s personal medical record doesn’t seem to fit in the category of protecting individual rights.

Also, since when can an attorney general decide if someone who has not been convicted of a crime and awaiting sentencing be prohibited from traveling to another state? I suppose a woman who had an abortion in another state will be required to wear a scarlet “A”, much like in Nazi Germany where Jews had to wear a yellow Star of David.

#2 is “Project 2025.” Content of Project 2025 was drafted by the Heritage Foundation – more appropriately called the Hermitage Foundation given their Russian czarist-like ideas. The essence of Project 2025 is to eliminate all independence of agencies within the federal government. The target kickoff date for swiftly centralizing control is January 2025, immediately following the election of a Republican president.

Project 2025 would take away independence of Department of Justice, Dep’t of Defense, Federal Reserve, IRS, EPA, and a host of other agencies. Rather than the agencies having a degree of autonomy, especially DOJ and the IRS, all agencies would respond to direct orders from and be controlled by the president. At DOJ, the change would allow the president to direct an investigation and likely prosecution of anyone he or she chose, particularly political enemies. Not that we’ve already seen Trump try to do that, but this would formalize the process.

Project 2025 then sets the stage to effectively begin eliminating all individual rights. What’s the problem, you say? Just vote Republican and you’ll be OK. All those liberals are the real problem.
You’ll be OK except when you’re in a group that far-right Republicans don’t like. A partial list includes anyone who identifies as or is identified as LGBTQ, anyone with Hispanic heritage, anyone with any black heritage, anyone of Asian descent, anyone who is a Muslim or who is a Jew or even Native American. Actually, you’re likely SOL unless you are a descendant of an immigrant from Western Europe and a fundamentalist Christian who has no one in the family who the far right doesn’t like. What’s left is a pretty small group. You still interested in voting Republican?

How will the power grab proposed by the Heritage Foundation and supported by right-wing Republicans play out with a public at large? Actions by Republicans based on recommendations of the Heritage Foundation are likely to be met with a major counteroffensive by the public. One only needs to look at reaction in Israel to a similar effort to eliminate individual rights by the far right and Netanyahu.
Israel has been subject to widespread protests for weeks. Further key members of the military have threatened to resign. Now that the legislature has passed restrictions on the Supreme Court, the intensity and breadth of protests are likely to escalate. Israel faces the most internal challenge in its history. Much like the US faced from say 1850-1860.

The difference between public protests conducted in the US and protests conducted Israel is the degree of potential destruction and bloodshed. The US populace is heavily armed, and while no match for well-trained military, those with firearms can kill and wound many citizens who are not perceived as Trump loyalists. To be continued. END ENTRY #485

Other Topics. Interested in more info about climate change, what’s required to electrify a fleet of cars/trucks, what it was like to work day-to-day with Lee Iacocca and an array of other topics? Visit another page of this website, https://usrevolution5.com/jrd-thought-comments/

#484: Why Not? My Kid’s a Legacy and I’ve Donated Lots of Money!

09 Sunday Jul 2023

Posted by Jordan Abel in Education Issues, Societal Issues, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Welcome to a discussion about the upcoming 5th Revolution in the US, which I’ve titled the “Revenge Revolution.” For more about the Revenge Revolution and the author, Entry #1.  Periodically I write a “sense check” to assess whether a revolution in the US is possible or whether the entire exercise is based on a statistical aberration — i.e., a roughly 50-year cycle between major upheavals in the US Entry #476 was the most recent “sense check.”

BEGIN ENTRY #484: Well, well, well. Wealthy Republicans are beginning to understand that decisions have consequences. Soon after toasting the SCOTUS decision to overturn precedent and ban affirmative action, the Republicans began to realize legacy admissions were now on the chopping block.

No doubt many of the elite schools will find a way around any likely ban on legacy admissions, much like many of those schools will find a way around the ban on affirmative action.

The ban on legacies is supposedly being pursued to ensure equitable admissions at these elite institutions, just like the SCOTUS decision. Ironically, those pushing for a ban on legacy admissions are not thinking about possible consequences just like those pushing to ban affirmative action failed to consider consequences.

Yes, legacy admissions are overwhelmingly from white, wealthy families. But, who do you think donates large chunks of money to the school’s endowment; who do you think helps fund new buildings; and who do you think helps subsidize tuition of students admitted under affirmative action?  Don’t think too long about it. The answer is the families seeking legacy admissions.

What is the “opportunity cost” of denying one legacy admission?  That one legacy admission can generate a significant positive long-term financial impact on the academic institution.  What’s the downside?  Virtually nothing since the legacy rarely goes into a high-profile public position – George W. Bush being an exception – and many of those admitted will go back into the family business or live off a trust fund.

Simple example. The brother of a grammar-school classmate of mine was admitted to a high-profile, smaller private college. The brother was at best marginally qualified.

Why was he admitted? The father agreed to fund construction of a new building on campus.

Those wanting to ban legacy admissions should do the math.  The result of admitting one marginally qualified student was a new building that benefited thousands of students over the life of the building.

Given the benefits derived from preference given to the legacy student, who is being harmed? By the way, the student ended up going back to the family business.

There’s a potential cascading effect of eliminating any preferential treatment. Where does one draw the line allowing the institution to favor certain students academically and not others?  If affirmative action is eliminated for academic admission and then legacy admissions, the next logical step is to eliminate preferential treatment for athletes. 

Does anyone really think that 10 of the 12 members of the basketball team at say Duke University are   academically qualified? Same with athletes recruited for most high-profile football teams.

When the lawsuit is filed to eliminate preferential treatment for athletes, it will be fun to watch the Supreme Court use their pretzel logic to justify why sports admissions should be excluded while affirmative action and legacies are not. It will be even more fun to watch members of Congress react when they realize that athletic admissions to their favorite university have been changed. END ENTRY #484

Other Topics. Interested in more info about climate change, what’s required to electrify a fleet of cars/trucks, what it was like to work day-to-day with Lee Iacocca and an array of other topics? Visit another page of this website, https://usrevolution5.com/jrd-thought-comments/

#483. SCOTUS Plan: Bomb Brown; Promote Plessy.

02 Sunday Jul 2023

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Societal Issues, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Welcome to a discussion about the upcoming 5th Revolution in the US, which I’ve titled the “Revenge Revolution.” For more about the Revenge Revolution and the author, Entry #1.  Periodically I write a “sense check” to assess whether a revolution in the US is possible or whether the entire exercise is based on a statistical aberration — i.e., a roughly 50-year cycle between major upheavals in the US Entry #476 was the most recent “sense check.”

BEGIN ENTRY #483:: Some key decisions at the end of the 2022–23 term for SCOTUS were less surprising than the rationale justifying the decision. Three key decisions in particular seem to be laying the groundwork for the next opportunity to address the race issue.

Overturning affirmative action in college admissions was expected by a court that overturned Roe. The decision that negated President Biden’s Executive Order to waive a portion of student debt was another example of the Roberts’ Court stripping the authority of the executive branch that had been granted by Congress.  Another decision was allowing religious beliefs to justify being able to discriminate against another individual or group. 

Lots of ink this week and likely more next week about the impact of the affirmative action decision on college admissions, efforts by companies to diversify the workforce, etc. 

While the SCOTUS ruling effectively banned affirmative action, there was one notable exemption. Without any justification, the opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts excluded the military academies from the decision, allowing the academies to use race in selecting candidates for admission.

Why are military academies so different from Harvard, University of North Carolina, and other academic institutions? No explanation offered. But, maybe, just maybe, the service academies want the officer corps to reflect the composition of enlisted personnel. Like many claims made by conservative Republicans, no supporting data or explanation was offered.

Where do these decisions lead? In 2010, the Roberts’ Court gave corporations more rights than individual citizens in the Citizens United case. In 2013, the Roberts’ Court ruling in the Shelby Country case gutted key provision of the Voting Rights Act, allowing states to essentially restrict voting rights, especially for people of color. In 2022 to the Roberts’ Court stripped women of any rights over their bodies in overturning Roe.

See a pattern here? There are more examples of the Roberts’ Court taking away rights rather than granting rights. 

What’s the next target for the Roberts’ Court?  My bet is overturning the 1954 case of Brown v Board of Education. Overturning Brown would allow SCOTUS to reinstate Plessy v Ferguson, which established justification for having “separate but equal” facilities in transportation, education et al.

Think overturning Brown is unrealistic?  Read the language of opinions by Roberts and Thomas in the affirmative action cases.  Frequent reference to the “equal protection” clause in the 14th Amendment claiming that the clause prevents one segment of society from being favored over another. Since Republican appointees to SCOTUS often claim to be originalists, maybe they should consider why the 14th Amendment was written. 

The 14th Amendment was passed by Congress in 1866 and ratified in 1868.  I guess Roberts and the originalist gang failed history in high school or conveniently forgot the 14th Amendment was passed to protect blacks following the Civil War.  Was Roberts thinking, “Never mind history.  I need to make this decision seem rational, no matter how illogical.”

By the standards of the Roberts’ gang,  Brown effectively favors blacks by forcing the busing of children to white schools.  Brown also discriminates against whites by being bussed to what often are or were predominately black schools.  Brown discriminates against both groups by taking away rights to attend neighborhood schools.

Thus, Brown is effectively an affirmative action program for blacks, which SCOTUS ruled as unfair.  Therefore, to ensure there is no discrimination against any citizen, the only solution is to reinstate Plessy.  Reinstating a “separate-but-equal“ school system is a fair and equitable solution that allows children to attend neighborhood schools.

Reinstating Plessy seems far-fetched? No, I’ll bet the far right is preparing to file, if not having already done so, a challenge to Broun. The challenge likely will be filed in the 5th Circuit, which includes Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, and is packed with far-right judges. These judges then will allow the case to go forward to the Supreme Court.

What is the cumulative effect of the last decade of SCOTUS decisions?  Will the decisions affect the likelihood of a more intense 5th US Revolution, the Revenge Revolution? Constantly taking away individual rights – women’s right to choose, voting rights of non-white groups, equal protection of LBGTQ community, etc. – creates frustration and anger.  Women are angry about overturning Roe. While the affirmative action decision is less controversial than Roe, for those affected, the frustration may be comparable.

SCOTUS decisions that seem heavily weighted toward favoring a Republican base of white Christians, mostly men, plus the continued drip, drip of corruption of behavior by Thomas, Alito, and even Roberts, are intensifying the frustration.  There’s a saying I saw on an apron that seems to sum up the long-term problem for SCOTUS and Republicans – “When mama ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy.”   

As we approach July 4th, 2023, mama and many others ain’t happy.  And what Republicans and far-right SCOTUS justices seem to have overlooked, is their bizarre interpretation of the 2nd Amendment has resulted in widespread ownership of firearms among the frustrated majority.  These actions increase the likelihood of a more intense Revenge Revolution, which has already started but not yet boiled over.

Other Topics. Interested in more info about climate change, what’s required to electrify a fleet of cars/trucks, what it was like to work day-to-day with Lee Iacocca and an array of other topics? Visit another page of this website, https://usrevolution5.com/jrd-thought-comments/

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Affordable Solutions
  • Back Asswards Thinking
  • Background
  • Background Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Benefits of Revolution
  • Causes of the Revolution
  • Common Sense Policies
  • Corporate Policy
  • Definitions
  • Diversions
  • Economics
  • Education Issues
  • Federal Budget
  • General Motors
  • Gov't Policy
  • Infrastructure & Fixed Fuel Prices
  • Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products
  • Lessons of Revolution
  • Personal Stories
  • Possible Solutions
  • Post Trump Presidency
  • Rebranding Black Community
  • SCOTUS
  • Sense Check
  • Societal Issues
  • Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Tech Tsunami
  • Trump 47
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • usrevolution5
    • Join 32 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • usrevolution5
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar