• Home
  • Booklets/Grouped Entries
  • Tech Tsunami
  • List of Entries to Date
  • About the Author

usrevolution5

~ USA Headed for a 5th Revolution! Why?

usrevolution5

Category Archives: Lessons of Revolution

What are some of the lessons from the Revenge Revolution? How did the expectations of the populous change following the revolution? Once could describe most changes as a benefit.

#266 What’s Supposed to Melt in the US Melting Pot? (Part 2)

02 Monday Oct 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues

≈ 1 Comment

Readers: this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about the Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.

Note: most entries are formatted as conversations.  Characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters (see link at top of page).  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office, Washington, DC.  Conversation starts Entry #265.

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie: “Jordan, while Gelly and I were getting coffee did you get ahold of Rock Man and Two Dogs?”

Jordan: “Left messages for both of them. I’ll talk to them later. Let’s get started.”

Gelly: “May I stay for the conversation, please? Sounds as if it could be interesting.”

Jordan: “Of course. I assumed you were going to stay. Your perspective is always valuable. And, as if you need a reminder, feel free to jump in the conversation any time.”

Greenie: “OK, so now we need to figure out…or at least discuss…if there is any validity to the assumption that long-term culture could affect current behavior of different nationalities or ethnic groups?  And, if so, how and to what degree?  Right, so far?”

Jordan:  “Right so far.  Keep going.”

Greenie:  “Then we asked, ‘For any ethnic group or nationality in the US, how much of the culture should melt in the US melting pot and how much of the culture should remain…un-melted as it were?’ Getting some idea of how much should melt might help us understand what affect long-term culture might have had on the Revenge Revolution…and how US society might address culture-related issues in the future.”092615_2031_Characters7.gif

Jordan:  “You got it.”

Gelly: “Before the coffee break youse guys decided to do a quick study on three groups…blacks, Native Americans and Jews, and starting with Jews.”

Jordan: “Your mimicking of ‘youse guys’ was pretty good. Yes, we agreed to start the analysis with Jews, which somehow seems appropriate since we just finished the High Holidays.”

Gelly: “Seems to me a specific question or two might help get the conversation started. So, here goes.  An issue that often comes up when talking about Jews, ‘What is it about the culture of Jews that seems to push for so much education? Why does it seem the vast majority of Jews have college degrees…and a very high percentage have advanced degrees? What about the culture would make that happen?”

Greenie: “Good way to get started, Gelly. I think the answer involves two factors. The first is Judaism promotes education throughout life. And some pretty intense education starts at an early age.  By the time you’re a 12-13 year-old, you’re learning all kinds of things preparing for a bar or bat mitzvah. And these kids are required to lead part of the Shabbat service, including reading a bunch of Hebrew…which is not major language these days outside of Israel.”

TurtleneckJordan: “Point well taken, Greenie. Lots of pressure at an early age to learn something that’s very difficult for many. The experience begins to build a foundation for a willingness to try to learn difficult subjects through one’s formal education…and for many, a lifetime of learning.”

Gelly: “What was the second reason?”

Greenie: “Jewish immigrants realized that education was a way out of the ghetto. With an education, you didn’t have to be involved in some type of manual labor. And, education was a way to improve socio-economic status.”

092615_2031_Characters10.gifJordan: “Gelly, here’s a story that illustrates the point. The scene: the inauguration of the first Jewish president. A lady turns to the president-elect’s mother and says, ‘The first Jewish president.  You must be very proud of your son.’ The mother turns and says, ‘Yes, I’m very proud of him…but you should meet his brother, the doctor.’”

Gelly: “That’s a good story. Now, help me understand the link between those examples and how long-term culture might affect current behavior? In the Torah there are lots of examples of Jews as shepherds and some examples as skilled trades. Where’s the link from those old-culture jobs to the attitude today of life-long education?”

GraduationGreenie: “To me, the link is an understanding by many rabbis and many Jewish families that education has been and continues to be a way to break from the past. Much like leaving Egypt was a way for Jews to break away from physical slavery, education has been a way to break away from economic slavery.”

Jordan: “In virtually every service at the temple, there is a reminder to congregants that Jews were once slaves in Egypt. While not discussed in services, just a few generations ago, whether Jews were in the ‘old country’ or in the US as immigrants, many were slaves to lower-paying jobs.”

Balancing actGelly: “That’s interesting. So, if I interpret you correctly, understanding how to break away from adverse circumstances without completely throwing out the old culture is a key lesson.  In a way the lesson is a balancing act — in the US understanding what part of the culture should melt into the melting pot and what should not melt. Being able to create such a balance might be a key lesson for other groups – blacks, Native Americans, etc.”

Jordan: “Let’s hold that thought and match it against what information comes out of the conversations with Rock Man and, as you guys keep saying, Two Dogs.”

BeginningGreenie: When you talk to them, could you please remind each of them we are only in the data-gathering phase?  Let them know we are trying to determine if our assumption has any validity.  If it does, we’ll need more guidance from them and help from some of their contacts.  I just don’t want them to think the call is the end of the study.  It’s just the beginning.”

Jordan:  “Yes, I’ll be very clear with them.  Thanks for the reminder.”

(Continued)

#262 How Normal Citizens Started to Regain Control

04 Monday Sep 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Causes of the Revolution, Lessons of Revolution

≈ 6 Comments

Readers: this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about the Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  

Note: most entries are formatted as conversations.  Characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Coffee shop near Jordan’s office, Washington, DC

092615_2031_Characters11.pngMatt:  “Jordan, thanks for taking time to meet.  Gelly said you were busy trying to catch up after taking last week off.”

Jordan:  “Yeah, I needed a break from Washington.  What’s up?”

Matt:  “I’m writing another chapter in the book about the Revenge Revolution.  The focus is how normal citizens began to take back control of the government.”

Jordan:  “Take back control before or after the Revenge Revolution?”

Matt:  “They clearly regained control after.  What I’m trying to explain is actions by citizens that may have accelerated the Revenge Revolution.”

TurtleneckJordan:  “That’s interesting.  So your premise, if I can call it such, is that actions of ordinary citizens might have accelerated the Revenge Revolution.  How will you support the idea?”

Matt:  “I picked a timeframe to review and measure actions.  To help establish a baseline, I looked back at the media reports, print articles – newspapers and web, radio and broadcast for what I thought were three key periods – (i) first 6-12 months of the first Obama Administration; (ii) first 6-12 months following Obama’s re-election and (iii) early part of the Trump Administration.”

Jordan:  “So, what, if anything, stood out?”

drone-manMatt:  “At the beginning of the Obama Administration there was lots of frustration with Congress.  Really frustration with Congress and the Executive branch.  Despite the frustration, the discourse was reasonably civil.”

Jordan:  “But weren’t there were some fairly public hate groups?   Seems like a lot of guys were vocal about not wanting a black president.”

Matt:  “For sure hate groups were there.  And some were vocal.  But, aside from some websites, there wasn’t a major public platform for them.”

fox-news-logo bJordan:  “C’mon, Matt.  You don’t think Fox News was an outlet for these guys?”

Matt:  “Not as much as you might think…at least at the beginning of Obama’s presidency.  Until I did the research, I’d forgotten how much farther right and more outlandish O’Reilly’s and Hannity’s commentaries became each year Obama was in office.”

Jordan:  “Least we not forget commentaries from the paragon of truth and objectivity, Rushman.”

Matt:  “For those three guys and a few others it was a race to see who could stretch the truth the most.”

three-stoogesJordan:  “Despite Larry, Moe and Curly, I mean O’Reilly, Hannity and Rushman, the Republican presidential candidates seemed to keep a reasonable lid on things.  McCain and Romney were both professional, save a few slips here and there.  Palin was another story…she’s still looking for Russia or some polar bear.”

Matt:  “Then post Romney, the Republican party starts to fracture and in walks Trump.”

Jordan:  “You know, if you look back at Trump’s remarks in the late 1990’s and even up to pre-Obama, he was much more mainstream…even rational.”

Matt:  “Who knows what started eating at his brain.  Whatever it was he became more and more outrageous with his remarks.  But more importantly…”

Jordan:  “…more importantly Trump provided a public platform for the fringe groups.”

Matt:  “Then he got elected.  Well, elected by a majority of the Electoral College.  OK, elected.”

Jordan:  “Then what?”

Trump KingMatt:  “You know what.  The king kept throwing red meat to fringe-group supporters in order to feed his fragile ego.”

Jordan:  “Here’s an issue for you to explore.  As he became more and more deranged, why did mainstream Republicans get lockjaw?  Why didn’t Republicans in Congress publically try to stop him?”

Matt:  “Apparently no kahunas and focus on themselves rather than constituents.  Other than a few equally delusional rabid-right House members, everyone else knew his behavior was bad for the country.”

Jordan:  “So why did Republican House reps and most Republican senators do nothing of substance.  Why?”

Matt:  “Fear of losing a re-election I suppose.”


Bums OutJordan:  “Ironically, that’s exactly what happened.  Voters said, ‘Throw the bums out.’”

Matt:  “And that takes us to 2018.  Based on my analysis, the 2018 election was a pivot point when people began taking back control.  Not a complete control but a start.”

Jordan:  “Do you think the 2018 election laid the groundwork for the Revenge Revolution.”

Matt:  “Pivot point, yes.  But the causes of the Revenge Revolution started to build years earlier.”

Jordan:  “What about all the Republican Trump supporters that were voted out of office in 2018?”

Matt:  “Jordan, you and I both know that the party of the president historically has lost seats in mid-term elections.  Not as many as 2018 but Republicans losing seats was not unexpected.”

Jordan:  “You don’t think anything changed politically in 2018?”

Matt:  “To me the real change in 2018 was more and more individuals began to take action to make change in society.”

newspaper_bwJordan:  “When you mentioned individuals taking action, I recall an editorial written by the rabbi emeritus at our temple.  The content was personal but also laid out a call to action.  Hard to ignore.”

Matt:  “Tell me more.”

Jordan:  “Part of her father’s family was lost in the Holocaust.  One of her points was we…citizen we…need to recognize that such events could occur in the US if we don’t stop hate groups.”

politicsMatt:  “Was she OK with free speech?”

Jordan:  “Free speech was not an issue.  But there’s a distinct difference between free speech and actions taken by hate groups to thwart rights of others.  Free speech and oppressive actions are clearly different and should not be confused.”

Matt:  “The editorial reminds of something else I need to explore.”

Jordan:  “That is?”

ChurchMatt:  “Evangelicals.  Why did do many support Trump?  Obviously, not all evangelicals supported Trump but a very high percentage did…even after he’d been in office for 6-7 months.  For evangelicals, all of Trump’s unethical behavior before the election which continued after the election…yet they continued to support him.”

Jordan:  “What’s even stranger to me is the percentage of Jews that continued to support him.  Granted the absolute numbers were not high but what were they thinking?”

Matt:  “Any ideas on why seemingly religious people would continue to support Trump, whose behavior was so contrary to their beliefs?”

torahClipJordan:  “No logical reason.  I think the fundamentalists forgot their scripture.  Someplace in Torah…probably Leviticus but I’m not sure…there’s a section that talks about when leaders are humble and admit mistakes, the populous will also be more humble and caring.”

Matt:  “And what happens to the populous if leaders deny mistakes?”

Jordan:  “People will begin acting the same way as their leader.”

Matt:  “And we know Trump never, ever admitted a mistake.”

(Continued)

#260 Going after the Donald. Collusion? Illusion? Follow the Money. (And thanks Donald.) (Part 3 of 3)

12 Saturday Aug 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s Washington office following meeting with Greenie and JC.  Series with JC and Greenie starts Entry #244 and ends Entry #257. This conversation starts #258.

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Whew, I feel better.  A break and a coffee refill.  Now, where were we?”

Jordan:  “You were asking why Mueller and the other Congressional investigations didn’t start following the money earlier.  Actually, I think they did but tried to keep quiet about it.”

Gelly:  “By keeping quiet, you think they reduced the likelihood that Trump would try to fire Mueller?  Had Trump really known where the investigation was headed, he might have tried to fire Mueller right away.”

Jordan:  “Probably.  But one thing about all the investigations baffles me.”

Gelly:  “Only one?  And that is?”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Trump’s behavior.    I mean he had to know one or more of the investigations, especially Mueller’s, would lead to his finances.  How could you think otherwise?”

Gelly:  “I agree.  Somehow…and we’ll never know for sure…Trump seemed naïve enough to believe that he could hide all the illicit financial deals…”

Jordan:  “…and even more naïve believing his taxes never would be disclosed.  What was the guy thinking?”

Trump KingGelly:  “He thought he was king.  The Donald lived in his own goofy ‘I’m-above-it-all’ world.  Surely the rest of the family von Trump had some common sense.”

Jordan:  “For a while I thought Kushner might be OK.  However, in short order he proved to be the caricature of a developer – shady and untrustworthy.”

Gelly:  “I must admit feeling sorry for Ivanka’s and Jared’s kids when he got into so much trouble.  But, hey, he was a big boy and should have known better.”

jailJordan:  “Another example of the apple not falling far from the tree.”

Gelly:  “You mean old-man Kushner, I mean Jared’s father, being convicted of tax evasion and witness tampering…and then spending time in jail?”

Jordan:  “Yes.  OK, so the key players in Trump family were stinko.  What’s even worse to me is the family seemed to be able to drag seemingly respectable people into the Trump gutter…and do it quickly.”

amateur hourGelly:  “I have some friends who were part of the White House staff early on in the Trump Administration.  Most had worked for the Obama Administration and a few also had worked for the Bush Administration.  All…and I mean every single person…was shocked at the lack of professionalism among Trump’s key staff members.  They said calling it ‘amateur hour’ would be a compliment.”

Jordan:  “What’s equally shocking to me is how quickly some of the cabinet appointees started to take on Trump’s demeanor.  I understand cabinet heads conveying the message but taking on Trump’s a-hole demeanor was frankly shocking.”

Mean DogGelly:  “In more polite terms, you mean like dogs who take on their master’s behavioral characteristics?”

Jordan:  “Never thought about it in those terms but yes.  Good analogy, Gelly.”

Gelly:  “Look, it’s cathartic to beat up on the Trump family and their lackeys.  As I look back, what bothers me the most .was how Trump and his Alt-right crowd attempted to corrupt the democracy and destroy the US.  And for what purpose?  Money?”

PutinJordan:  “For Trump, money for sure.  And Trump had to try to hide the Russian connection.  Because of all the earlier shady financial dealings Putin had Donnie boy by the short hairs.”

Gelly:  “Jordan, I know what you mean but could you use a different expression, please?”

Jordan:  “Alright.  In addition to greed, what seemed to drive the Donald was an insatiable appetite for respect.   He was the quintessential wanna be.”

Gelly:  “Apparently what he never understood was money, wealth and fame don’t buy you respect.  It might buy respect with people who voted for him but not with people who really matter and get things done.”

Jordan:  “That’s a rather elitist statement.  Actually, I think I know what you mean but those words wouldn’t play well with a lot of people.”

RespectGelly:  “There’s probably a better way to phrase it.  But just step back and think about it.  Who in your life do you respect?  If you made a list, I’ll bet many on the list don’t have much money…and certainly aren’t famous.”

Jordan:  “You’re right.  And you know what?  Not a single person that comes to mind sought public recognition.  Even if they were rich, they just made things happen…sometimes big things and sometimes small things but always unassuming and humble.”

Gelly:  “OK, so there you go.  Contrary to people on your list, little Donnie acted like a bully and thought people should respect him.  Even after he became president, he tried to bully everyone.  And what happened?  Did he earn anyone’s respect?”

Jordan:  “No, he lost it for himself and the US, other than with the bunch of other wanna be’s who continued to support him.  Little Donnie the bully became the laughing-stock of serious people worldwide.”

Gelly:  “Well, there is one thing we can thank him for.”

070715_2218_141SenseChe1.gifJordan:  “There is?  What’s that?”

Gelly:  “He hastened the Revenge Revolution.  The country was on track for a Revenge Revolution sometime in the next decade or so…but his behavior caused it to occur 5 years, maybe 10 years early.  I guess we should thank him for that, right?”

Jordan:  “I guess so.  It’s about the only thing we can thank him for.”

Gelly:  “Thanks Donnie for hastening the Revenge Revolution and getting America back on track…not your track but the right track.”

Jordan:  “With that point want to call this a wrap for the day?”

Gelly:  “Good idea.  Let’s get out of here.”

#259 Going after the Donald. Collusion? Illusion. Follow the Money. (Part 2)

06 Sunday Aug 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s Washington office following meeting with Greenie and JC.  Series with JC and Greenie starts Entry #244 and ends Entry #257. This conversation starts #258.

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Ok, you’ve had your break.  Now tell me, if Trump was such a bad financial risk, why would the Russians…or anyone for that matter…lend him money?”

Jordan:  “Simple.  Lenders wanted to park money in a safe place.”

Gelly:  “I don’t get what you mean.  Trump’s a financial risk and investors want to park money in a safe place.  The two ideas are just the opposite.  Why not a bank?  What am I missing?”

Jordan:  “Put yourself in the shoes of say a Russian oligarch.”

Gelly:  “You mean like one of Putin’s cronies?”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Your term, not mine…but yes, like one of Putin’s cronies.  And Putin allowed you to run a ‘private’ company in Russia.”

Gelly:  “By ‘private’ you mean one of the companies that used to be run by the state.  Like some aluminum mining company?”

Jordan:  “Great example.  Your company’s product, aluminum, can be sold worldwide.”

Gelly:  “So the Russian company sold aluminum…and I assume for a profit.  Didn’t that profit automatically flow back to the company?”

Jordan:  “A portion of the profit, and maybe in some cases all the profit could have gone back to the company.  More likely a portion of the profit was skimmed off the top and distributed to Putin and his cronies.”

Money-clip-artGelly:  “Then what did they do with the money?  Kind of hard to hide if it all the money is inside Russia.  How’d they get the money out of the country?”

Jordan:  “Let’s say the aluminum was sold to a company in Brazil.  To pay for the aluminum, the Brazilian buyer told its bank to wire funds to the Russian company’s account at some international bank.  The international bank split the funds, depositing a portion to the Russian aluminum company and a portion to a different account.”

Gelly:  “The other account being for the benefit of Putin and cronies.  That’s legal?”

Jordan:  “Not if the bank knows what’s going on.  The account for Putin and cronies was probably under some corporate name.  Call it Russian Trading Company, LLC.”

Gelly:  “So the international bank justified transferring the money to the account for Putin and cronies because the Russian Trading Company supposedly earned some type of commission, or whatever…right?”

Jordan:  “You’re catching on fast.”

gangster-cartoon-clip-art-540pxGelly:  “This skimming goes on for a while and, voila, the Russian Trading Company has this big pile of money.  To protect themselves against a regime change and a new gang of thieves, I mean officials, Putin and company want to hide the money someplace.”

Jordan:  “If you had a pile of cash in a bank and wanted to park in a safe location, what would you invest in?”

Gelly:  “I suppose buy real estate in some safe country, like England or the US.  I’d buy real estate in maybe London, New York, Florida…maybe Washington.”

Jordan:  “And say in the last 15-20 years you’re a foreign national looking to buy real estate, what name might come to mind?  Who might be able to offer you property that you could purchase?”

Trump Tower SignGelly:  “Gee, let me think hard about that one.  None other than ‘Mr. Straight-Shooter Real-Estate-Developer’ himself, the Donald.”

Jordan:  “Bingo.”

Gelly:  “I understand the idea of buying real estate…but what about the risk?  Trump’s financial track record in real estate was marginal at best.”

Skimming MoneyJordan:  “If you obtain money illegally…like skimming it off the top…then you realize some portion might be lost as you try to make the illegal money appear legitimate.  Let’s just say that when dealing with Trump, Putin and cronies knew they might lose some of their ill-gotten gains.”

Gelly:  “So even if half the money was lost, they’d still end up with hundreds of millions…probably billions of dollars.”

Jordan:  “Remember that famous Trump real estate deal in Palm Beach?”

Duck with MoneyGelly:  “You mean that place he bought for about $40 million and sold not long after for $95-$100 million?  That one?”

Jordan:  “Yes.  And who was they buyer?”

Gelly:  “I don’t remember his name but some Russian oligarch.  The Russian paid Trump way too much money.  However, even if the buyer sold the property for what Trump paid for it, the oligarch has $40 million of illegal money stashed in the US.  At the same time, the Donald made a $60 million profit for doing nothing…well, turning a blind eye.”

Jordan:  “The Donald had to know what was happening with that deal.  Nobody would pay $100 million for a $40 million piece of property.  Now, for the Russians and the Donald, multiply that deal many time over.”

Golf FlagGelly:  “So that’s why, at least according to Donald Junior, the Russians were a major source of capital when Trump bought all those golf courses…like the one in Scotland…and Charlotte…and Mar-a-Lago…and Bedminster, NJ…and the list goes on and on.”

Jordan:  “And had the Donald and/or Junior kept their mouth shut, all would have likely been OK.  No one really started to probe the source of financing…at least until he became a presidential candidate.  Why no probe?  Because the funding ‘partner’ on the documents was some innocuous-sounding LLC.  Plus with the multi-layered corporate structures it was very hard to trace lenders and ownership.”

Gelly:  “I can’t believe I’m going to say this about Trump, but foreign financing of golf courses was not illegal per se was it?”

Jordan:  “No.  And you know what.  Had Trump not become president, it’s highly unlikely many of the financial shenanigans would have come to light.  But when he became president…and when he kept denying any association with Russia, he opened his kimono.”

Gelly:  “I understand that part.  Go back to the banks for a minute.  Surely they knew it was illegal to divert money from these Russian companies. C’mon.”

Jordan:  “I agree and most banks stayed away from those kinds of deals.”

Gelly:  “But apparently some banks were on the take…just like Putin and cronies?  Which banks?”

Jordan:  “In Trump’s case, two banks stood out.  Deutsche Bank and Bank of Cyprus.”

Cypress BankGelly:  “That Bank of Cyprus name rings a bell.  Wasn’t one of Trump’s cabinet members connected with that bank?”

Jordan:  “Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross was a major investor and vice-chairman of the Board.”

Gelly:  “Talk about blatant disregard for ethics and the law.  Trump flaunted his relationship with the Russians and then appointed what could have been his chief money-laundry guy to a cabinet post.”

Jordan:  “Don’t be so hard on Wilbur Ross.  His supporters claimed he cleaned house at Bank of Cyprus by getting rid of the Russians.”

Gelly:  “Maybe so, but given all the other misinformation that came out of the Trump White House, claims like that are hard to believe.  In any case, I want to understand what took so long to get Trump out of office.”

Money TrailJordan:  “You mean why didn’t the investigations just start by following the money trail rather than spend time on all the other issues?”

Gelly:  “Yes, seems like the best way to the truth is just follow the money trail.  Now, I need a break.”

 

 

 

#258 Going after the Donald: Collusion? An Illusion. Better to Follow the Money

29 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ 2 Comments

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s Washington office following meeting with Greenie and JC.  Series with JC and Greenie starts Entry #244 and ends Entry #257.  

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Enjoyed the visit with JC and Greenie.  You guys are great to be around.  Always interesting conversation.”

Jordan:  “Agreed.  I really enjoy them.”

Gelly:  “Speaking of interesting…I heard something about you at the briefing on brainwashing.”

Jordan:  “Good I hope.  Good about me, not about someone brainwashing me.”

Gelly:  “Good about you, yes but the details were a bit murky.”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Alright, what was it?”

Gelly:  “Someone told me you were involved behind the scenes as part of the investigation of Trump’s finances.”

Jordan:  “Now, who told you that?”

Gelly:  “The person asked me not to say.  Well, is it true?”

Jordan:  “Yes, it’s true.  I guess no need to keep my involvement a secret now.  It’s been a while since the special prosecutor laid bare all the financial shenanigans of Trump and family.”

Gelly:  “So, exactly what was your role?”

Jordan:  “One of the lawyers on the special prosecutor’s team knew my background and asked me to look at some deals Trump made.”

Gelly:  “I thought some of the lawyers were finance experts.”

sense-checkJordan:  “The lawyers on the team had a lot of experience prosecuting illegal financial transactions.  They wanted someone who had experience constructing models for starting and operating a business.  Part of the investigation was to reverse engineer Trump’s deals.  They wanted to know how the deal was constructed.  Knowing that would help them understand who was really benefitting.”

Gelly:  “Why you?  You’re not a real estate guy?”

Jordan:  “True but most of the modeling work I’ve done has started with a blank piece of paper.  The lawyers thought my approach might help them discover where to begin to probe further.  The deals were complicated but money always needs a path to follow…and the path was what they were looking for.”

Gelly:  “Were you successful?”

Jordan:  “I’ll never really know for sure.  The team seemed pleased with my recommendations.”

SecretGelly:  “OK, what did you find out that didn’t make the papers?”

Jordan:  “C’mon Gelly, you know I can’t give you any specifics.”

Gelly:  “Then just tell me whatever good stuff you can.”

Jordan:  “Trump family ties to the Russians were far more extensive than anyone realized when the investigation started…and for the most part what was publicly discussed.” 

Gelly:  “I’m listening.  More, please.”

Jordan:  “There was a lot of talk about Trump colluding with Russians during the 2016 election.  Clearly there were lots of misdeeds and some felonies.  However, when the prosecution team started digging into what happened, the idea of collusion became the sideshow compared to the illegal financial transactions.”

Gelly:  “Why does it always seem best to follow the money?”

Duck with MoneyJordan:  “Following the money is a great place to start.  For Trump, money was the, capital THE, primary measure of success.  Trump was a wanna be rich guy.  Really obsessed with being perceived as rich.”

Gelly:  “If the money came from Russia, then where’d the money go?”

Jordan:  “Virtually all the golf courses were purchased using Russian money…and most of the money probably was laundered.”

Gelly:  “Golf courses, you mean like Mar-a-Lago and that place in New Jersey where he kept running off to?  Places like that?”

Golf Bet 1
Jordan:
  “Yes.  He even bought a country club in Charlotte and renamed it Trump something or other.”

Gelly:  “How’d you find out it was Russian money?”

Jordan:  “Like most everything about Trump and family, they couldn’t keep their mouths shut.  Before the Donald became a serious candidate for president, Junior bragged to some Charlotte locals about the Russians being their source of capital to buy the golf courses.”

Gelly:  “Another example of the apple not falling far from the tree.  The Donald couldn’t stop bragging and neither could Junior.  It’s almost as if they wanted to leave bread crumbs for the ducks to follow.”

Trump KingJordan:  “Being naïve and a braggart is not a good combination if you’re involved in criminal activity.  Even worse when you think you’re king.  Donald and the family were naïve about how Washington politics and incredibly naïve about the consequences of shady international financing.  Consequences not just from the government but consequences from the lenders.”

Gelly:  “So the Russians fund the golf courses and resorts like Mar-a-Lago.  What about the hotels and apartment buildings?”

Jordan:  “Same deal.  Keep in mind that after the Trump debacle in Atlantic City where his casinos when bankrupt and he stiffed creditors, no major US bank would lend money to him.”

Gelly:  “So he turns to less credible sources.  But why the Russians?  Why would they lend him money if he’s such a bad risk?”

Jordan:  “Hold that question.  I need to take a quick break.” 

(Continued)     

 

#256 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 13) (Were some Trump voters brainwashed?)

09 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington.  (Series “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.) 

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Wow, what a pleasant surprise.  Two civilized people in the office.  Didn’t think you’d still be here.”

JC:  “It was tough to put up with Jordan this long, but we survived.”

Greenie:  “Tell us where you’ve been Gelly…well, tell us what you can.”

Gelly:  “The briefing was about an upcoming Congressional hearing studying the Trump Administration.”

010414_1635_16TeachingS1.jpgJC:  “More about scandals?  That seems pretty well researched by now.”

Gelly:  “No, the study is a bit unusual for a Congressional committee.  The topic is understanding why so many initial Trump supporters continued to support him despite the widespread scandals and his behavior that was considered so un-presidential by almost all standards.”

Greenie:  “Is the study bi-partisan?  I know that since the Revenge Revolution Congress has shown more willingness to work across the aisle, but the study could be a resistance point for many Republicans.”

Jordan:  “I agree.  What’s the rationale for rehashing the impact of Trump’s behavior on the populous?

Gelly:  “The underlying theme…if I interpreted the briefing correctly…is that somehow a very high percentage of the initial Trump supporters seemed to be brainwashed.  The study will attempt to confirm the premise…and if confirmed, then attempt to understand how they were brainwashed.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “I agree it’s unusual for a Congressional committee to be exploring such a topic.  Is the hearing going to be open to the public?”

Gelly:  “No decision as of yet.  Obviously a very sensitive topic, even with Trump out of office.”

Jordan:  “Any restriction on talking about the hearing?”

Gelly:  “For now we’re supposed to be discreet and limit the number of people we talk to about it.  But no outright prohibition.”

JC:  “So you won’t be put on double-secret probation if you talk to Greenie and me about it?”

Gelly:  “You guys are OK for the general information.  But as I know you will, please be extremely discreet in discussing this with anyone else…at least until we get further instructions.”

TurtleneckJC:  “Any idea what sources of data will be used for the study, aside from our expert witness here?”

Jordan:  “I’m not sure why I’m even on the short list for prospective witnesses.”

JC:  “Maybe you’ll be a subject of the study.  Just kidding.  Actually, brainwashing a portion of the population is not all that unusual.”

Jordan:  “OK, I’m game, tell me your theory.”

JC:  “In grad school I wrote a paper about how certain religions have been able to effectively brainwash followers.”

Greenie:  “Interesting topic.  I don’t think you ever told me about the paper.”

PreachJC:  “My conclusion was that people who follow religions that preach or instruct congregants to follow strict rules or believe that certain statements are absolutes that should not be questioned…the people who continue to follow the religion have been brainwashed.”

Greenie:  “By that definition, then you’re saying the ‘fundamentalists’ of most every major religion have been brainwashed.  In the US, that covers the more hard-core Christians, Jews and Muslims.”

Gelly:  “Don’t fundamentalists of each religion believe that only they have all the answers and you must follow certain rules and never question certain absolutes?”

JC:  “Yes, and those that don’t stand-up and salute are branded as categorically wrong.”

Jordan:  “Did your study include any non-religious examples?”

JC:  “Lots of them, although I had to limit the scope of the paper.  Otherwise, I never would have graduated.  When you really begin to delve into the topic, you discover that a number of segments of the population appear to have been brainwashed.  People who seem to be brainwashed include many categories – buyers of commercial products, other family members, political parties…its surprising how widespread brainwashing really appears to be.”

AppleGelly:  “You mean like people who insist on buying only Apple products, even though Apple costs more and might not perform as well?  Or those people who vote only for one party no matter how flawed the candidate?  Are you considering these people brainwashed?”

JC:  “Exactly.  I know some of this might sound like good marketing…and to some extent brainwashing probably is good marketing.  What really surprised me, though, was the predilection to brainwashing was not correlated to IQ.  Brainwashing seemed correlated more closely with personality type.”

Greenie:  “You mean the ‘down-2-over-4’ personalities who insist that everything must be just so.  No deviating from the standard or you will be punished.  That kind of personality?”

Gelly:  “They seem like they’re brainwashed.  What about people who are not ‘down-2-over-4’ types?”

Connect DotsJC:  “Another group that seemed prone to brainwashing was the group that ‘can’t connect the dots.’  The ‘no-dots’ crowd seems to view each event as discreet and somehow not linked.  They cannot fathom that somehow someone might be manipulating them.”

Jordan:  “What about predilection to brainwashing among different cultures?”

JC:  “Cultures that seem to exhibit more structured behaviors and those that are dominated by a very structured religion seem more prone.”

BrainwashedGreenie:  “The idea of modern-day mass brainwashing is scary stuff.  I never really considered the possibility being so widespread.  I mean, there’s always been some portion of the political parties that was effectively brainwashed.  The old Blue-dog Democrats, for example, and the more recent alt-right Republicans.  But you’re paper implied a higher percentage of the population.”

Gelly:  “Did your study determine the method used for brainwashing?”

JC:  “I’ll give you my conclusion after I get a coffee refill.  Greenie, I know we said we were out of here but let’s stay a few more minutes, OK?”

Greenie:  “Alright by me as long as you’re buying the refill.  Wonder why I didn’t know about this paper.”

(Continued)

#255 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 12)

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington a few days after the dinner meeting with Gelly, JC and Greenie.  (Series “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.) 

JC:  “Jordan, how ‘bout another cup of coffee.  Then Greenie and I need to blow this pop stand.”

Jordan:  “That’s an expression I haven’t heard in years.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “I’d like a coffee, too, please.  By the way, where’s Gelly?”

Jordan:  “At some briefing about an upcoming Congressional hearing.  I guess I’m on the short list to testify.”

JC:  “Well, Greenie, such company we keep.  Mr. Big Shot you want a coffee as well?”

Jordan:  “Please.  And I haven’t been called yet, so there.”

(Everyone gets coffee)

Greenie:  “Let’s try to wrap up the conversation about who took out the Donald.  I’ve got one more angle that I’d like to discuss.”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “You suggesting it wasn’t the FBI…but somebody else?”

Greenie:  “I’m more focused on why that who.  I’ll go with the FBI until we find out otherwise.  My angle is about the Donald’s mental state.”

JC:  “you mean like he was going crazy and the Feds had to protect the country?”

Greenie:  “Crazy, yes, but not the usual personality flaws everyone seems to remember.”

JC:  “If not narcissism, bullying, insecurity and a bunch of other stuff, then what?”

trump-scowlGreenie:  “I think the real issue was early-stage dementia.  It wasn’t very bad before the election.  Then the deterioration accelerated once he was in office.  It was like his brain was on a ski slope headed downhill fast.”

JC:  “We’ve talked about this before, right?  Or have I got Alzheimer’s?”

Greenie:  “Yes, we’ve talked about it.  But it was more as a sidebar.  I don’t think we gave his mental condition enough consideration.”

percent.pngJordan:  “Alright.  I know his father, Fred Trump, had Alzheimer’s.  There’s also data indicating a higher probability of being inflicted if a parent has had Alzheimer’s.  Assuming your prognosis is correct, do you really think the dementia was having that much of an effect?”

Greenie:  “Think about his behavior the first six months.  There seemed to a marked deterioration in his ability to stay focused on anything.”

U TurnJC:  “And think about the tweets?  He’d take one position one day and then a few days later he’d do a U-turn and contradict himself.  Then he’d claim he never sent the first tweet.  I agree he seemed to have less and less control over his emotions.”

Greenie:  “I still shake my head when I think of his tweets about Mika Brzezinski.  The content was insulting, the statements were lies.  Here’s a president spending time tweeting about a couple of cable news talking heads while his signature legislative proposal, repealing Obamacare, was getting ready to die in the Senate.  He could not seem to comprehend what was important.”

Jordan:  “All but the hard-core Republicans thought his behavior with Brzezinski was way out of line.”

Greenie:  “Keep thinking about his actions in late spring, early summer 2017.   What else did the Donald do that was scary mentally?”

092615_2031_Characters12.gifJC:  “Oh, nothing more than insulting heads of state, insulting the mayor of London and then disclosing Israeli secrets to the Russians.  Oops, I forgot he effectively gave the finger to his own cabinet members by regularly contradicting them publicly.  Then, he attempted to trash any media that questioned anything about the administration.  What was really kooky was the wrestling video aimed at CNN.  Shall I go on?”

Jordan:  “Greenie when you asked the question about the Donald’s mental state, I thought of a different incident.  The incident continues to stand out for me as an example of loss of control.”

Greenie:  “What have we missed?”

Jordan:  “I know the incident might sound trivial compared to some of the public insults of heads of state…and it might be trivial.  What sticks in my mind as a loss of control…more than any other incident…was him driving a golf cart on the green at Bedminster, NJ.”

Golf CartJC:  “I sorta remember that incident but why do you think driving a cart on the green is so important?”

Jordan:  “Trump owned, or at least had his name attached to a number of high-end golf courses.”

Greenie:  “Didn’t he buy Doral in Miami?  My folks used to play there occasionally.”

Jordan:  “He owned Doral.  You guys know my former life included lots of time playing golf, working with the PGA and playing an occasional round with a touring pro…at some very nice golf courses.  Golf has a strict set of rules and etiquette that proper golfers follow.”

JC:  “Get to the point, please.”

Jordan:  “I can’t think of worse behavior on a golf course than driving a cart on the green.”

JC:  “OK, so Trump was rude and broke rules.  Tell me something new.”

Temper TantrumGreenie:  “Jordan’s point, I think, is that Trump had spent all this time and money trying to build credibility with the high-end golfing community.  Then in one fell swoop he managed to alienate almost all the people he was trying to impress.  So the question is ‘why would anyone behave like some spoiled brat and do that?’”

JC:  “So he started destroying the very thing he was obsessed about building.  I know Alzheimer’s does destroy one’s ability to be disciplined and logical.  Without the effect of Alzheimer’s, I agree, why would anyone be so stupid?”

Jordan:  “I like the golf example because it’s not about politics, not about collusion with the Russians, not about money laundering…well, not about shady financial dealings anyway.  None of the ‘he said,’ ‘she said’ allegations.  No controversial media coverage.  The driving-on-the-green incident might not be so obvious to non-golfers but it’s clean and simple.  Just straightforward behavior that demonstrated complete lack of self-control and lack of understanding consequences.”

Greenie:  “So, you’re saying the FBI viewed the golf-cart-on-the-green incident as non-political behavior confirming his instability.  The icing on the cake, if you will.   Then, the FBI decided he was too unstable and it had to take him out.  If that’s you’re argument, I’ll buy it.”

JC:  “So will I, Jordan.”

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGreenie:  “Now, we’re out of here.  Please tell Gelly we said hello…and not to take you too seriously.”

Jordan:  “Don’t worry, she doesn’t take me too seriously.  And, I think she just walked in the office.  Stay a couple more minutes and see what she has to say about the upcoming hearing.  Besides, she’ll enjoy the chat.”

JC:  “OK, but we do have to get going very soon.”

(Continued)

#251 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 8)

28 Sunday May 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ 1 Comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Following entry #250, several readers sent messages asking me to continue the series on “Who Took Out the Donald?”   Given the startling revelations last week…and seemingly every week… about bizarre behavior by Trump and/or key members of the Administration, I agreed.  Series about “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.

Scene: Jordan’s office in Washington a few days after the dinner meeting with Gelly, JC and Greenie.

Gelly:  “Excuse me, Jordan.  Matt…you know Matt the reporter…is on line 2 and would like to talk to you.”

Jordan:  “Sure but did he say what the topic was?”

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “No, and he never does.  But, hey, he’s a reporter.”

Jordan (Picking up the phone): “Hello, Matt.  Long time.  All OK at your end, I hope.”

Matt:  “Everything’s fine, Jordan.  Thanks for asking.”

Jordan:  “I assume this is not a social call.  So, what’s up?”

Matt:  “I’ve been working on a book about the Trump Administration and I need some help.”

Jordan:  “From me?”

Matt:  “Probably but I’d really like to talk to your buddy Greenie.  She wrote a series of articles about the Administration and I’ve always liked her insight.”

Jordan:  “You want to meet her here, or privately?”

Matt:  “Your place would be great.  Sorry to be so pushy, but any chance we could meet today?”

Jordan:  “You want lunch, too, right?  Don’t answer.  I think she’s in town.  Let’s assume 2:00pm today here unless we get back with you.  OK?”

Matt:  “Great.  Thanks.”

(Time: just before 2:00pm.)

Jordan:  “Well, well, the dynamic duo has arrived.”

JC:  “You should be honored we’re here.  I’d convinced Greenie to catch an early movie…until you called.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “Jordan, meeting with Matt will be more fun than a movie.  Exactly what does he want to talk about?”

Jordan:  “Ask him.  He just walked in the door.”

Matt:  “Hello, Greenie, nice to see you again.”

Greenie:  “Nice to see you Matt.  JC is visiting and we were off to a movie…”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “…until she convinced me meeting with you would be more fun.  Nice to see you Matt.”

Matt:  “Nice to see you, JC.  Thanks everyone for taking time, especially on such short notice.  I’m working on a book about the Trump Administration and would like to get your perspectives on a couple of issues.”

Jordan:  “Can you frame the gist of the book a little bit more…and maybe the sequencing as well?”

092615_2031_Characters11.pngMatt:  “The book attempts to address and link, if a link exists, various events leading up to when Trump was taken out.”

Greenie:  “Funny you mention the Donald being taken out.  Not really funny but all of us had a long conversation over dinner the other night about that very topic.”

Matt:  “Good.  Let’s hold the results of that conversation until we address other topics.  Topics such as, at least according to the Washington Post article, Jared Kushner contacting the Russian ambassador about setting up a secret communications channel to the Kremlin.”

Tin Can PhoneJC:  “And, duh, Kushner wanted to use the communications equipment in the Russian embassy.  According to the article, even the Russian ambassador was taken aback by the idea.”

Greenie:  “Even if the article was incorrect, which no one has ever proved, there’s a bigger problem.  This might surprise you but my view is Kushner was more of an egomaniac than Trump.  Hard to fathom, I know, but I really believe that.”

Matt:  “Interesting perspective.  Why do you think so?”

jailGreenie:  “Look, the guy’s in his mid-30’s, which is ego time for many people.  But he’s also from a family with two question marks.  Maybe I should just call them marks.  His father did time in prison for fraud.  And, he’s Orthodox, although I must say his behavior sometimes made me question his commitment.”

JC:  “I agree with the part about his father, but do you think being Orthodox was an issue?”

howdy-doody-2Greenie:  “OK, skip the Orthodox issue.  Here’s a 30-something in the White House with no previous political experience…and he’s effectively running the country.  Kushner pulls a string and the puppet Trump reacts, just like Howdy Doody.  Just thinking of it is depressing.”

JC:  “I know I wasn’t expected to be part of this conversation but I agree with Greenie.  It would be hard for anyone Kushner’s age and in Kushner’s position not to end up with a huge ego…even you, Jordan.”

Matt:  “The Kushner problem started before Trump was inaugurated.  The contact with the Russian about the back-channel network was during the transition.”

Greenie:  “Part of the problem for Trump, Kushner and some other key staffers was no Washington experience.  These guys had no idea how government really worked.”

goofy006JC:  “You mean running the running the government turned out to be more complicated than doing a real estate deal?  Who knew?  Seriously, what really baffles me is how could they have thought communications with the Russians were not being monitored?”

Matt:  “I’ve scratched me head ever since the FBI released info about General Flynn talking to the Russians.  I know he was retired at the time, but still.”

3-StarsJC:  “How could a, what 3-star general in the Marines, with some national security experience no less, not know about calls to the Russians being monitored?”

Jordan:  “Flynn knew it and ignored it.  My source, a military officer senior to Flynn and familiar with Flynn, said in a casual phone conversation shortly after the inauguration that Flynn should never have been appointed and would not last.”

Matt:  “He was right but what was the reason?”

Jordan:  “Flynn’s gigantic ego and history of uncontrolled behavior.”

Matt:  “Had anyone in the incoming administration contacted your colleague?”

Jordan:  “Not to my knowledge.  And don’t ask who my colleague is.  He’ll deny the conversation and won’t talk anyway.”

JC:  “So what I’m hearing is there were a bunch of incompetent egomaniacs with a big set of kahunas running the transition team and then the White House.”

Greenie:  “Not phrased elegantly but the conclusion seems spot on.  However, there’s one piece that seems inconsistent with that conclusion.”

Matt:  “And that is?”

PoliticianGreenie:  “Mike Pence and Jeff Sessions were experienced politicians.  Sessions had been in the Senate for 20 years and had been US attorney earlier in his career.”

Matt:  “I’m having the same problem.  Why did two highly experienced politicians let all this bizarre behavior happen?”

Greenie:  “People do strange things when money or power is on the table…and especially money and power.”

JC:  “Strange things like throwing away all principles?”

Greenie:  “Exactly.  We are almost certain Trump and Kushner were paid by the Russians.  Maybe not directly but the businesses were paid.  The Donald, Jr. admitted the Russians were the source of funds for many of the Trump golf courses.”

TurtleneckJordan:  “Back to Pence and Sessions.  Where did their money go?”

Matt:  “Maybe they didn’t get any money.”

Greenie:  “I don’t believe it.”

(Continued)

#248 Who Took Out the Donald? (Part 5)

07 Sunday May 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues, Stupid Is as Stupid Does

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.  Series about “Who Took Out the Donald?’ begins Entry #244.

Scene: Restaurant Washington, DC near Jordan’s office.  Jordan, Gelly (Jordan’s assistant) and two-long time friends having drinks and hors d’oeuvres.   

Voice: You’re right about how much worse the Revenge Revolution could have been.  But the ‘who-done-it’ part is wrong.”

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “And you are?”

Sandy:  “Well, I was at the next table and couldn’t help but hear the conversation.  And, you got a key part of it wrong.”

Gelly:  “Like I said, ‘who are you?’”

Sandy:  “Actually your buddy here…Jordan…knows me.”

Jordan:  “C’mon, how would I know you?”

Sandy:  “Let me give you a hint.”

Jordan:  “Wait…Sandy?”

Sandy:  “You got it Jordan.  So I’ve lost some weight…”

Jordan:  “…and grown a goatee.  You look good.  But what brings a guy like you to Washington?  This is not your kind of town.”

092615_2031_Characters8.gifSandy:  “Work here now.  Work for the…”

Jordan:  “…don’t tell us.  Let me guess…the NRA.  Right?”

Sandy:  “Yes, and loving every minute of it.”

JC:  “Could you guys do us a favor and let us in on your secret.  Who are you, Mr. NRA?”

Sandy:  “Obviously you don’t remember me but we’ve met before.  Your name’s something like ‘JC’, right?  And I’ve also met you (pointing to Greenie).  Your name is some color…but I’ve forgotten what color.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “Greenie.  I vaguely remember you.  JC and I were having dinner with Jordan and we ran into you in the restaurant.”

Sandy:  “You got it.  And the third member of the female trio is…?”

Gelly:  “Gelly.  Nice to meet you Sandy…at least I think so.”

Jordan:  “Sandy, tell us what you think’s wrong about our theory of who took out the Donald.”

Sandy:  “Like usual, you pointy heads…you know I like you Jordan, but you are a pointy head…you’re making it too complicated.”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “In defense of Jordan, which I don’t do often, how’s it too complicated?”

Sandy:  “I agree the Russians, the CIA and even the FBI are good candidates to have taken out the Donald.  There were way too many loose cannons on the White House staff and all the agency insiders got real nervous.”

Greenie:  “You mean loose cannons in the White House like General Flynn?”

Sandy:  “He was borderline crazy and only out for himself.  His ego and greed got in the way of any rational thinking.”

JC:  “I agree there’s probably a bunch of other candidates who would qualify as incompetent…but who’s on your list of dangerous characters?”

Sandy:  “Rather than listing individuals, think about what Trump and his staff did…or at least tried to do for themselves.  Not do for Trump supporters, let alone do something for the populous, but just for themselves.”

Trumpcare Rose GardenGreenie:  “You mean like completely gutting healthcare for worker bees and transferring a bunch of money to themselves.  Everybody from doctors to Warren Buffett thought the House’s version of Trumpcare was terrible.  And the Donald and staff praised it, even gloated over it.  I still remember the picture from the Rose Garden.  Yuch!  What else?”

Gelly:  “Yeah, you mean the one-page tax plan that transferred even more money to the wealthy…and who knows how much was going to be transferred directly in the pockets of the Trump’s and the Kushner’s.”

JC:  “You mean like gutting all the environmental protection so Trump’s so-called Secretary of State could reward his buddies at Exxon by allowing then to drill willy-nilly drilling on Federal land?”

Sandy:  “And I’ll tell you one that might get me fired from my current employer.  Proposing that a concealed carry permit in any state must be honored nationwide was incredibly stupid.”

JC:  “Am I dreaming?  A NRA guy is actually saying what I just heard?”

Sandy:  “Yes, I said it.  That proposal would have allowed some local official in who-knows-where Wyoming with a population of 8,000 to have power over the mayor of NY City with a population of 8,000,000.”

Greenie:  “Wow, I’m impressed you feel that way.  Maybe this guy is all right after all.”

Wild West GunSandy:  “Look, even in the wild west, you had to check firearms in certain locations.  The wild west guys seemed to know more about the dangers of firearms than the dodo birds in the White House.”

Gelly:  “So where’s this conversation going?  Seems as if we’re off track.  I mean, like who killed JR?  Well, more like…”

JC:  “…more like who took out the Donald?  So Sandman, who do you think took out the Donald?”

Sandy:  “A couple of regular guys.  Maybe not regular guys by your standards, but hey, regular to me.”

TurtleneckGreenie:  “Are these NRA kinda guys?”

Sandy:  “Big time.”

Jordan:  “Former military?”

Sandy:  “Special forces and then some.”

Gelly:  “But weren’t these kinda guys big Trump supporters in the 2016 election?  So why would they take him out?”

 traitorSandy:  “You listed all the reasons – tried to repeal health care, tried to give more tax breaks to the wealthy, tried to gut EPA.  The supporters felt stabbed in the back.”

JC:  “But those actions seem to be the very reasons these guys voted for Trump in the first place.  What changed?”

Sandy:  “Remember that French lady who said something about letting the starving peasants eat cake?”

JC:  “You mean Marie Antoinette.”

Sandy:  “That’s the one.  And you know where she ended up.”

GuillotineJC:  “Maybe heads should have rolled at the White House sooner.  Sorry, that was too easy.”

Sandy:  “As I was saying, Trump’s let-tem-eat cake moment…really two moments…were when the worker bees started to realize he wasn’t delivering on the promise of higher-paying jobs.  The types of jobs he promised never came back.   And then the tax proposals that kept funneling money to his family.”

Greenie:  “Not to be a stick-in-the-mud, but making the first family rich has happened the last few administrations…and probably a lot longer.”

irs-logoSandy:  “I know, but at least the other guys didn’t try to get rich while in office.  Trump supporters didn’t want to believe at first what was really happening.  But when the tax returns got released, the evidence was in black-and-white.  All but the blind could see what was happening.”

 Gelly:  “So the Trump supporters are not making any progress financially and the Donald and family are getting richer by the day.”

Sandy:  “All those excuses about not being able to not release tax returns…all BS and a smokescreen to hide the truth about where the money came from and how much he was raking in.”

Greenie:  “So, now the initial Trump supporters are getting very upset.  Then, these so-called regular guys…at least by NRA standards…decide to take out the Donald.  Jordan, you buy Sandy’s theory?”

(Continued)            

#247 Who Took Out Howdy Doody…err the Donald? (Part 4)

30 Sunday Apr 2017

Posted by Jordan Abel in Lessons of Revolution, Societal Issues

≈ Leave a comment

First-time readers, the dialogue in this blog is set in the future (sometime after the year 2020).  Each entry assumes there has been a 5th revolution in the US — the Revenge Revolution.  More about Revenge Revolution and author, Entry #1.  List and general description of entries to date.  Annual assessment if Revolution plausible.

Note: most characters appear in a number of entries, with many entries building on previous conversations.  Profile of characters.  You’ll catch on quickly.  Thanks for your time and interest…and comments.

Scene: Gelly, JC and Greenie having drinks with Jordan following a session in Jordan’s office.  Conversation starts Entry #244.

Waiter: “Would you folks like to order some food?”

Waiter 2JC:  “Yes, we would…right Jordan?”

Greenie:  “I agree, although I’d prefer some hors d’oeuvres to a full dinner.”

Jordan:  “So what do you guys want?”

Waiter takes order.

Gelly:  “I’m still a bit confused about who took out the Donald.”

Greenie:  “Do you agree it probably wasn’t the North Koreans or the Mexican drug lords?”

Gelly:  “Yes, either one of those groups seems unlikely, now, although I must say both seemed to be reasonable candidates at first.”

Greenie:  “Then if we stick to our list, that leaves the Russians or someone, some group inside the US government.”

Water BugGelly:  “I guess that’s what’s confusing me.  I agree Trump was like a water bug when it came to international policies – he’d head off in one direction one second and then quickly shift to another direction.  But other than some blustery talk about bombing North Korea and the infamous wrong-way destroyer claim, he never caused any turbulence below the surface.  The diplomats and the professionals somehow handled the foreign-policy issues.”

JC:  “So you think the real danger was on the domestic side…to US citizens and the fabric of the country, right?”

092615_2031_Characters7.gifGelly:  “Seems to me that some of the Trump proposals, if implemented as drafted, would have completely split the country.  Even though some of the crazier the ideas were eventually watered down, we still had the Revenge Revolution.  Just how much carnage would there have been if had not been taken out?”

JC:  “Jordan, your turn.  You’ve been awfully quiet.”

Jordan:  “I agree the damage domestically could have been much worse had the Donald stayed in office.  Not worse than nuclear war, which I thought we might have for a while.  Fortunately, some cooler heads among the military top brass really got control of the all the nasty weapons.”

Howdy-DoodyGelly:  “Ya’ know, it’s probably not fair, but when I think of Trump as president I think of Howdy Doody.”

Greenie:  “That’s great.  Howdy Doody…and with a bad haircut!  What a great picture.  Now, as I think about it, I can’t decide whether to laugh or cry.  Maybe I should do both.”

JC:  “Back to you Jordan.  You’re a big dog inside the Beltway.  I mean you get calls from POTUS, visit the White House.  What really went on?”

Jordan:  “I was not part of the ‘in’ crowd during the Trump Administration.”

JC:  “C’mon.  Staffers and guys like you all know one another.  What went on?  Who took him out?”

Jordan:  “I’ll give you my take but your buddy here, Greenie, might know more than I do.  She’s the real insider.”

092615_2031_Characters2.jpgGreenie:  “Thanks for the compliment…but it’s been a while since I was an insider.  Anyway, I want to hear your take.”

Jordan:  “I think Gelly’s right.  Trump was like Howdy Doody.  A small group of puppeteers were pulling the strings and he would react accordingly…often without thinking or even understanding.”

Gelly:  “I know I said Howdy Doody, but wasn’t he smart enough to realize what was going on?”

Jordan:  “I don’t know what his IQ was but I do know he was woefully uneducated about a wide range of subjects…and especially about government.  I’m not sure he even read, let alone opened, the Constitution.  His knowledge of geography was breathtakingly and embarrassingly awful.”

Gelly:  “Didn’t he have an MBA from some top school?  What was the name of it?”

JC:  “Wharton.”

Gelly:  “That’s it, Wharton.  I remember he claimed he graduated first in his class.”

092615_2031_Characters1.jpgJC:  “Maybe first in not studying and first in narcissism.  But he’s no one’s academic.  And I’m sure Wharton would rather not admit he’s an alum.”

Greenie:  “You know the tell-tale signs of his lack of education were his statements that ‘Who knew health care could be so complicated?’ and ‘Being president is more difficult than I imagined.’”

JC:  “Duh, Donald, you been living in a cave?  What really scared me was I’m not sure he had any idea of what was really going on…other than playing golf at Mar-a-Lago.”

Greenie:  “Then the Howdy Doody president introduces two absolutely off-the-wall proposals – replacement for Obamacare and a tax plan.  Both would have resulted in huge transfers of wealth to the already wealthy, including the Donald.”

Gelly:  “What about letting oil and gas companies drill willy-nilly on public land?  We sure didn’t need any more oil or gas.”

Greenie:  “He claimed his actions were for job creation.  That claim was a ruse, if he ever understood what he was proposing.”

JC:  “Back to you, again, Jordan.  Who took him out?  If not the CIA, who else should we put on the list?”

Waiter: “Excuse me.  Here’s your hors d’oeuvres.”

TurtleneckJordan (to waiter):  “Thank you.  Just one check and give it to me, please.”

JC:  “Thanks Jordan but just because we’ve got food and you picked up the tab doesn’t mean you’re off the hook.  Who besides the CIA could have done it?”

Jordan:  “What I heard is a couple of black-hole guys directed by the top-level adults inside NSA.”

Gelly:  “If that’s the case, what happened to the Secret Service?”

Jordan:  “They were likely told to discreetly disappear for a few minutes.”

gangster-cartoon-clip-art-540pxJC:  “More like, if you don’t disappear voluntarily, then you, too, will disappear.”

Jordan:  “I suspect that’s about how the conversation went.  Greenie, what have you heard?”

Greenie:  “I’d say your story’s about right.”

JC:  “Unfortunately, taking out the Donald didn’t stop the Revenge Revolution.”

Greenie:  “But as we talked about, can you imagine how much worse it would have been had he stayed in office?  I shudder to think of it.”

Voice: “Folks, you’re right about how bad it could have been.  But some of your story is wrong.”

(Continued)

 

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013

Categories

  • Affordable Solutions
  • Back Asswards Thinking
  • Background
  • Background Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Benefits of Revolution
  • Causes of the Revolution
  • Common Sense Policies
  • Corporate Policy
  • Definitions
  • Diversions
  • Economics
  • Education Issues
  • Federal Budget
  • General Motors
  • Gov't Policy
  • Infrastructure & Fixed Fuel Prices
  • Innovative Thinking: Ideas and Products
  • Lessons of Revolution
  • Personal Stories
  • Possible Solutions
  • Post Trump Presidency
  • Rebranding Black Community
  • SCOTUS
  • Sense Check
  • Societal Issues
  • Stupid Is as Stupid Does
  • Tech Tsunami
  • Trump 47
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • usrevolution5
    • Join 32 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • usrevolution5
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...